Your search

Background: Postoperative fibrosis is a common and significant complication following liposuction for lipedema, often leading to tissue induration, pain, and compromised aesthetic results. This fibrosis can jeopardize the overall success of the procedure by reducing skin elasticity and altering the intended body contour.Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of early shockwave therapy (SWT) initiated 1 week after surgery to reduce postoperative fibrosis and preserve the functional and aesthetic outcomes of liposuction in lipedema patients. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 50 female patients with stage II–III lipedema who underwent power-assisted liposuction (PAL). Patients received SWT sessions three times per week for 3 weeks, starting 7 days postoperatively. Outcomes were compared to a control group of 25 patients who did not receive SWT. Primary endpoints included fibrosis severity assessed by ultrasound elastography, skin elasticity measurements, and patient-reported outcomes on pain and satisfaction. The SWT group exhibited a significant reduction in fibrosis (2.1 ± 0.3 vs 3.8 ± 0.5, p < .001), improved skin elasticity (1.5 ± 0.2 mm vs 1.0 ± 0.3 mm, p < .01), and lower pain scores (2.3 ± 0.8 vs 4.7 ± 1.2, p < .001) compared to the control group. Results: Patient satisfaction was also higher in the SWT group (92% vs 68%, p < .01). Conclusion: Early postoperative shockwave therapy is an effective and safe treatment to reduce fibrosis after liposuction for lipedema. By modulating fibroblast activity, reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, and improving tissue perfusion, SWT preserves the surgical outcomes and enhances patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that integrating SWT into postoperative protocols could be a valuable strategy to optimize liposuction results in lipedema patients.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic disorder of adipose tissue that predominantly affects women and is frequently misdiagnosed as obesity or lymphedema. Traditionally associated with the lower extremities, lipedema can also involve the abdominal region, although there are currently no established diagnostic criteria for abdominal lipedema. This study aims to propose a diagnostic algorithm for abdominal lipedema based on clinical features, macroscopic observations, and ultrasound findings. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from 327 patients treated between March 2018 and March 2024 for lipedema, including those with abdominal involvement. Clinical evaluations, ultrasound imaging, and surgical outcomes were examined to assess the prevalence and characteristics of abdominal lipedema. Patients were classified based on lipedema severity, and criteria for abdominal lipedema diagnosis were established through clinical and imaging data. RESULTS: The study identified that abdominal involvement increases with the severity of lipedema, with 31% of patients with stage II lipedema and 70% of those with stage III lipedema exhibiting abdominal manifestations. The proposed diagnostic algorithm includes maximum, major, and minor criteria, such as symmetrical fat deposition, pain, and non-responsiveness to diet and exercise. Specific threshold values for each category were defined to establish the diagnosis. The findings highlight the existence of both ascending (from legs to abdomen) and descending (from arms to abdomen) centripetal progression patterns, challenging traditional notions that limit lipedema to the extremities CONCLUSION: Abdominal lipedema is a significant and underrecognized manifestation of the condition, requiring specific diagnostic criteria to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. The study proposes a diagnostic framework based on clinical and imaging features that can improve the recognition and management of abdominal lipedema. Multidisciplinary treatment approaches, including both conservative measures and surgical interventions such as abdominoplasty and liposuction, are recommended to improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by abnormal fat accumulation, pain, often necessitating surgical intervention. While liposuction is the primary treatment to remove pathological fat, postoperative skin laxity poses a significant challenge, particularly in advanced stages. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the efficacy of helium plasma technology as an adjunct to liposuction of the lower limbs across the three clinical stages of lipedema, with a focus on its impact on skin tone, elasticity, and the necessity for dermolipectomy. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 90 female patients with lower limbs lipedema, divided equally across Stages I, II, and III. Helium plasma technology was applied post-liposuction to enhance skin tightening. Outcomes included postoperative skin elasticity, dermolipectomy incidence, and patient satisfaction RESULTS: In Stage I, skin tone and elasticity increased by 25%, though the already low need for dermolipectomy remained largely unchanged. In Stage II, skin elasticity improved by 40%, reducing the incidence of dermolipectomy from 30 to 10%. In Stage III, while the need for dermolipectomy was unaffected, helium plasma contributed to improved skin elasticity and patient satisfaction. No major adverse events were reported. This study is limited by the absence of a randomized control group and the lack of blinding in outcome assessments, which may introduce observer bias. These factors should be considered when interpreting the results and highlight the need for future controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: Helium plasma technology offers stage-specific benefits in liposuction for lipedema of the lower limbs. It enhances skin tone and elasticity in early stages, reduces dermolipectomy requirements in intermediate stages, and improves skin quality in advanced stages when combined with dermolipectomy. Further research is needed to validate these findings and optimize protocols for clinical use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BackgroundLipedema is a chronic disorder involving abnormal accumulation of subcutaneous fat, primarily in the lower limbs. Liposuction is an effective treatment, but postoperative complications such as fluid retention and seroma formation are common. While the use of surgical drains is well established in other areas of plastic surgery, their role in lipedema liposuction remains unclear.MethodsThis prospective observational study involved 50 consecutive patients with stage II or III lipedema who underwent lower leg liposuction. A novel passive drainage technique was used, involving glove drains fashioned from sterile, powder-free nitrile gloves and inserted through existing liposuction incisions. Drain duration, postoperative swelling, and complications, particularly seroma formation, were evaluated.ResultsAll patients completed follow-up with no major complications. Glove drains remained in place for an average of 2.4 ± 0.5 days. Only 2 patients (4%) developed seromas requiring single aspiration. No infections, hematomas, or lymphatic complications were recorded. Patients reported reduced swelling and discomfort compared to historical cases without drains.ConclusionPassive glove drains appear to be a simple, safe, and effective method to manage postoperative fluid collections after lipedema liposuction of the lower legs. The technique may lower the risk of seroma formation and promote early recovery, characterized by reduced postoperative edema, improved patient comfort, and an uncomplicated short-term postoperative course. Further controlled studies are needed to validate these findings and establish standardized drainage protocols in lipedema surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by disproportionate fat deposition, pain, and progressive functional impairment. Although diagnosis remains primarily clinical, ultrasound has emerged as a valuable adjunctive tool for diagnosis, surgical planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative monitoring. The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the current and potential applications of ultrasound throughout the entire surgical management pathway of patients with lipedema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A narrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Articles published up to January 2026 were screened using the keywords "lipedema," "lipoedema," "ultrasound," "ultrasonography," "lipedema diagnosis," "lipedema imaging," "lipedema surgery," and "liposuction." Studies addressing ultrasound-based diagnosis, differential diagnosis, surgical planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative monitoring in lipedema patients were included. Both original investigations and review articles published in English were considered. RESULTS: Ultrasound demonstrated significant utility across all phases of lipedema management. In the preoperative setting, it improved diagnostic accuracy by identifying characteristic sonographic features, quantifying tissue thickness, differentiating lipedema from obesity and lymphedema, and enabling vascular mapping for surgical safety. Advanced techniques, including three-dimensional ultrasound, provided additional information regarding fascial alterations, fibrosis, and fluid accumulation. Intraoperatively, ultrasound off ered real-time visualization of anatomical structures, facilitated identification of fibrotic tissue, and supported more precise liposuction by improving cannula guidance andassessment of tissue homogeneity. Postoperatively, ultrasound enabled early detection of complications such asseromas and hematomas, assessment of fi brosis and tissue remodeling, and long-term monitoring of disease recurrence or progression. DISCUSSION: The available evidence suggests that ultrasound represents a versatile, accessible, and reproducible imaging modality capable of enhancing both diagnostic and surgical aspects of lipedema care. By integrating ultrasound intopreoperative evaluation, intraoperative decision-making, and postoperative follow-up, clinicians may improve surgical precision, patient safety, and treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, the current literature remains limited by heterogeneity, operator dependency, and the absence of standardized imaging protocols. Larger multicenter studiesare needed to validate diagnostic criteria and establish evidence-based guidelines for ultrasound utilization in lipedema management. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound has the potential to become an integral component of modern lipedema management. Its applications extend beyond diagnosis to encompass surgical planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative surveillance. The increasing availability of portable, high-resolution ultrasound devices may further facilitate its routine incorporation into clinical practice, ultimately contributing to safer procedures, more personalized treatment strategies, and improved long-term outcomes for patients with lipedema. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .