Your search

In authors or contributors
  • Introduction: Lipedema is a chronic female disease, characterized by an excessive accumulation of subcutaneous adipose tissue in the limbs and is commonly mistaken for obesity, although the two conditions often coexist. Obesity is associated with increased hedonic hunger and dysfunctional eating behavior. However, these aspects have not been investigated in females with lipedema and obesity. Objectives: The objective of this secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial was to compare changes in hedonic hunger and eating behavior following two different low-energy diets , low-carbohydrate (CHO) or low-fat, in females with lipedema and obesity. Methods: Females with lipedema and obesity (body mass index (BMI) 30-45 kg/m2) were randomized to two different low-energy diets (1200 kcal), low-CHO diet (LCD) (75 g CHO) or low-fat diet (180 g CHO) for 8 weeks. Hedonic hunger was assessed using the power of food scale (PFS) and eating behavior was assessed using the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) pre- and post-intervention. Results: A total of 70 females were included with a mean age of 47 years, and a BMI of 37 kg/m2. The LCD group reported a reduction in Food Present (P <0.001) and in Aggregated Score (P = 0.035) from the PFS, while no changes were seen in the low-fat diet group, with changes in Food Present over time being significantly different between groups (P = 0.050). The low-fat diet group reported increases in Restrained Eating from the DEBQ (P = 0.036) while only the LCD group reported decreases in Diffuse Emotions (P = 0.040), however, no differences between groups were found. Conclusion: A LCD may induce more favorable changes in hedonic hunger and eating behavior than an isocaloric low-fat diet in females with lipedema, which may be related to altered metabolic signaling pathways related to satiety and reward.

  • OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) compared with a control diet on pain in female patients with lipedema. The secondary objectives were to compare the impact of the two diets on quality of life (QoL) and investigate potential associations of changes in pain with changes in body weight, body composition, and ketosis. METHODS: Adult female patients with lipedema and obesity were randomized to either the LCD or control diet (energy prescription: 1200 kcal/day) for 8 weeks. Body weight and body composition, pain (Brief Pain Inventory measured pain), and QoL (RAND 36-Item Health Survey [RAND-36], Impact of Weight on Quality of Life [IWQOL]-Lite, and Lymphoedema Quality of Life [LYMQOL]) were measured at baseline and at postintervention. RESULTS: A total of 70 female patients (age, mean [SD], 47 [11] years; BMI 37 [5] kg/m2) were included. The LCD group had greater weight loss (-2.8 kg; 95% CI: -4.1 to -1.0; p < 0.001) and larger reduction in pain now (-1.1; 95% CI: -1.9 to -0.3; p = 0.009) compared with the control group. No association was found between changes in pain now and weight loss. Both groups experienced improvements in several QoL dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Diet-induced weight loss in women with lipedema can improve QoL. An energy-restricted LCD seems to be superior to a standard control diet in reducing pain.

Last update from database: 12/5/25, 8:54 AM (UTC)