Your search

BACKGROUND: Despite an increased interest in visualising the lymphatic vessels (lymphatics) with Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography (MRL), there remains little literature describing their appearance in non-lymphoedematous individuals. To determine lymphatic abnormalities, an understanding of how healthy lymphatics appear and behave needs to be established. In this study, MRL of individuals without a history of lymphatic disease was therefore performed. METHODS: A total of 25 individuals (15 female) underwent MRL of their lower limbs using a 3.0T Philips MRI scanner. The first 9 cases were recruited to establish the concentration of Gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) to administer, with the remainder imaged pre- and post-inter-digital forefoot GBCA injections at the optimised dose. Outcomes including lymphatic vessel diameter, tortuosity and the frequency of drainage via particular drainage routes were recorded. RESULTS: Healthy lymphatics following the anteromedial pathway were routinely observed in post-contrast T1 weighted images (average tortuosity = 1.09 ±0.03), with an average of 2.16 ± 0.93 lymphatic vessels, of diameter 2.47 ± 0.50 mm, crossing the anterior ankle. In six limbs, vessels following the anterolateral pathways were observed. No vessels traversing the posterior of the legs were seen. In a subset of ten vessels lymphatic signal, measured at the ankle, peaked 29:50 ± 09:29 mm:ss after GBCA administration. No lymphatic vessels were observed in T2 weighted images. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced MRL reliably depicts the lymphatics in the legs of healthy controls. Following inter-digital contrast injection, anteromedial drainage appears dominant. Quantitative measures related to lymphatic vessel size, tortuosity and drainage rate are readily obtainable, and could be beneficial for detecting even subtle lymphatic impairment.

Lipedema is a common disorder characterized by excessive deposition of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in the legs, hips, and buttocks, mainly occurring in adult women. Although it appears to be heritable, no specific genes have yet been identified. To identify potential genetic risk factors for lipedema, we used bioelectrical impedance analysis and anthropometric data from the UK Biobank to identify women with and without a lipedema phenotype. Specifically, we identified women with both a high percentage of fat in the lower limbs and a relatively small waist, adjusting for hip circumference. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for this phenotype, and performed multiple sensitivity GWAS. In an independent case/control study of lipedema based on strict clinical criteria, we attempted to replicate our top hits. We identified 18 significant loci (p < 5 × 10−9), several of which have previously been identified in GWAS of waist-to-hip ratio with larger effects in women. Two loci (VEGFA and GRB14-COBLL1) were significantly associated with lipedema in the independent replication study. Follow-up analyses suggest an enrichment of genes expressed in blood vessels and adipose tissue, among other tissues. Our findings provide a starting point towards better understanding the genetic and physiological basis of lipedema.

Lipoedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder mainly affecting women with excess subcutaneous fat deposition on the lower limbs, associated with pain and tenderness. There is often a family history of lipoedema, suggesting a genetic origin, but the contribution of genetics is not well studied. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for this disorder in a clinically ascertained cohort from Spain and performed a meta-analysis with the UK lipoedema cohort GWAS. We then used the results of this study as a replication of the inferred UK Biobank “lipoedema phenotype” study. Whilst our meta-analysis alone did not identify any genome-wide significant associations, our clinical cohorts provide support for three loci identified through the UKBB study: the chr2q24.3 GRB14-COBLL1 locus (rs6753142, PMETA=1.64x10-6), chr6p21.1 VEGFA locus (rs4711750, PMETA=8.99x10-7) and the chr5q11.2 ANKRD55-MAP3K1 locus (rs3936510, PMETA=1.67x10-5). We identify numerous rare SNPs with strong association signals in our meta-analysis (P<1x10-6) with support in both UK and Spanish datasets, three of which also show nominal support in the UKBB (P<0.05). These findings provide a starting point towards understanding the genetic basis of clinical lipoedema and demonstrate the utility of the interplay of large-scale biobanks genetic data and clinically ascertained cohorts to elucidate the genetic architecture of lipoedema.

Lipoedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder mainly affecting women, causing excess subcutaneous fat deposition on the lower limbs with pain and tenderness. There is often a family history of lipoedema, suggesting a genetic origin, but the contribution of genetics is currently unclear. A tightly phenotyped cohort of 200 lipoedema patients was recruited from two UK specialist clinics. Objective clinical characteristics and measures of quality of life data were obtained. In an attempt to understand the genetic architecture of the disease better, genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype data were obtained, and a genome wide association study (GWAS) was performed on 130 of the recruits. The analysis revealed genetic loci suggestively associated with the lipoedema phenotype, with further support provided by an independent cohort taken from the 100,000 Genomes Project. The top SNP rs1409440 (ORmeta ≈ 2.01, Pmeta ≈ 4 x 10–6) is located upstream of LHFPL6, which is thought to be involved with lipoma formation. Exactly how this relates to lipoedema is not yet understood. This first GWAS of a UK lipoedema cohort has identified genetic regions of suggestive association with the disease. Further replication of these findings in different populations is warranted.

Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue condition that primarily affects women. Despite increasing recognition of lipedema, the condition remains poorly understood and lacks standardized diagnostic criteria or confirmatory tests. Variability in definitions and measurement across clinical and research settings impedes comparability across studies, constraining the evidence base needed to support future advances in clinical practice and patient care. To address challenges associated with inconsistent definitions and data collection, the Lipedema Foundation (LF) partnered with clinicians, researchers, and biostatisticians to develop a Lipedema Common Case Report Form (CCRF). The CCRF was designed to be a research data harmonization tool and is not intended to define diagnostic standards or guide clinical treatment decisions. Its development involved review of published lipedema clinical guidelines and collaborative work to define data elements and attributes for inclusion. When they existed, validated or standardized measures were incorporated directly. When no suitable standardized measures were available, an iterative and collaborative process was used to develop lipedema-specific Common Data Elements (CDEs). The initial version of the CCRF was piloted in participants with and without lipedema, and updates based on participant and clinician feedback were incorporated into the CCRF. A biostatistical review evaluated data completeness, quality, and structure, leading to additional refinements. The final Version 1 instrument consists of 682 CDEs organized into four classifications: (1) Core, (2) Supplemental Highly Recommended, (3) Supplemental, and (4) Exploratory. The current version is prepared for dissemination in the field. By disseminating the CCRF broadly and encouraging adoption in all lipedema research beginning in 2026, including all newly initiated LF-funded projects, LF intends to evaluate its use with grantees and iterate systematically to achieve consistent and comparable data collection. The CCRF provides a structured framework for harmonized data collection that may facilitate comparability across studies and support future development of standardized diagnostic and research methodologies.