Your search

Objective: To examine the common and specific characteristics of fibromyalgia and lipe­ dema, two chronic soft-tissue pain syndromes without curative therapy options. Methods: Diseases’ characteristics were compared using the findings of extensive literature and the empiric data from two cohorts, both fulfilling standardized diagnostic criteria. Outcome was measured by various socio-demographics, the generic Short Form 36 (SF36), the Fibromyalgia Severity Questionnaire (FSQ), and the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). Empiric SF-36 data were compared to specific population-based norms and between the diagnostic groups, using standardized mean differences (SMD). Results: Female participants with fibromyalgia (n = 77) and lipedema (n = 112) showed comparable education levels and living situations. Lipedema cases were, on average, 3.9 years younger and BMI 6.3kg/m2 more obese. Women with fibromyalgia smoked more, did less sport, had more comorbidities, and worked less. Compared to the norms, health in fibromyalgia was worse than expected by SMD = –1.60 to –2.35 and in lipedema by –0.44 to –0.82 on the SF-36. The score differences between the two conditions ranged from SMD = –0.96 to –1.34 (all p < 0.001) on the SF-36 and the FSQ. For the inpatients (n = 77 fibromyalgia, n = 38 lipedema), the 6MWD was comparable (SMD = –0.09, p = 0.640). These findings were consistent with detailed data from the literature reviewed. Discussion: Fibromyalgia and lipedema share characteristics of clinical phenomenology and comorbid conditions. Disease perception is more pronounced in fibromyalgia than in lipe­dema, especially in social and role dysfunction, whereas the walking distance was similar for both syndromes. This difference may be explicable by limited coping skills in fibromyalgia.

BACKGROUND: Literature on the validity of outcome measurement in lymphedema and lipedema is very sparse. This study aimed to examine the convergent, divergent and discriminant validity of a set of 5 instruments in both conditions. METHODS: Cross-sectional outcome was measured by the generic Short Form 36 (SF-36), the lymphedema-specific Freiburg Quality of Life Assessment for lymphatic disorders, Short Version (FLQA-lk), the knee-specific Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), the Symptom Checklist-90-revised (SCL-90R), and the Six-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT). Construct convergent/divergent validity was quantified by bivariate correlations and multivariate factor analysis, and discriminant validity by standardized mean differences (SMDs). RESULTS: Health was consistently better in lymphedema (n = 107) than in lipedema (n = 96). The highest construct convergence was found for physical health between the SF-36 and KOS-ADL (bivariate correlations up to 0.78, factor loads up to 0.85, explained variance up to 56.8%). The second most important factor was mental health (bivariate correlations up to 0.79, factor loads up to 0.86, explained variance up to 13.3%). Discriminant validity was greatest for the FLQA-lk Physical complaints (adjusted SMD = 0.93) followed by the SF-36 Bodily pain (adjusted SMD = 0.83), KOS-ADL Function (adjusted SMD = 0.47) and SF-36 Vitality (adjusted SMD = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: All five instruments have specific strengths and can be implemented according to the scope and aim of the outcome examination. A minimum measurement set should comprise: the SF-36 Bodily pain, SF-36 Vitality, FLQA-lk Physical complaints, FLQA-lk Social life, FLQA-lk Emotional well-being, FLQA-lk Health state, KOS-ADL Symptoms, KOS-ADL Function, and the SCL-90R Interpersonal sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to quantify and to compare the associations between longitudinal changes in pain and depression in different chronic pain conditions. METHODS: Data were retrieved from 6 observational cohort studies. From baseline to the 6-month follow-up, the score changes on the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) bodily pain (pain) and the SF-36 mental health (depression) scales (0=worst, 100=best) were quantified, using partial correlations obtained by multiple regression. Adjustment was performed by age, living alone/with partner, education level, number of comorbidities, baseline pain and baseline depression. RESULTS: Stronger associations were found between changes in levels of pain and depression for neck pain after whiplash (n = 103, mean baseline pain=21.4, mean baseline depression=52.5, adjusted correlation r = 0.515), knee osteoarthritis (n = 177, 25.4, 64.2, r = 0.502), low back pain (n = 134, 19.0, 49.4, r = 0.495), and fibromyalgia (n = 125, 16.8, 43.2, r = 0.467) than for lower limb lipedema (n = 68, 40.2, 62.6, r = 0.452) and shoulder arthroplasty (n = 153, 35.0, 76.4, r = 0.292). Those correlations were somewhat correlated to baseline pain (rank r=-0.429) and baseline depression (rank r=-0.314). LIMITATIONS: The construct of the full range of depressive symptoms is not explicitly covered by the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate associations between changes in pain and depression levels were demonstrated across 5 of 6 different chronic pain conditions. The worse the pain and depression scores at baseline, the stronger those associations tended to be. Both findings indicate a certain dose-response relationship - an important characteristic of causal interference. Relieving pain by treatment may lead to the relief of depression and vice versa.

OBJECTIVE: Upper extremity lymphedema (UEL) is a burdensome disease with significant impact on quality of life underscoring the importance of quality of life measurements in this patient population. Only recently, the LYMPH Q Upper Extremity Module, a new patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM), has been developed. The aim of the study was to translate the LYMPH Q Upper Extremity Module from English to German and perform a comprehensive validation. METHODS: Translation was performed in accordance with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) best-practice guidelines. To validate the German LYMPH Q, a multicenter study was conducted. Internal consistency was determined by Cronbach's alpha. Reliability was assessed by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). To analyse construct validity, a Pearson correlation coefficient between the LYMPH Q, quickDASH and SF-36 was calculated. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the pre- and postoperative LYMPH Q scores in five patients receiving lymphatic reconstructive surgery. RESULTS: Validation was performed in a cohort of 65 patients. Internal consistency of the different domains was good to excellent (α: 0.87-0.97). ICC ranged from 0.74 to 0.92. The domains of the LYMPH Q correlated significantly with the corresponding domains of the SF-36 and quick DASH. Construct validity was good with eight of ten hypotheses confirmed. Significant improvements of function (46.4 ± 13.3 vs. 77.8 ± 11.5; p= 0.03), symptoms (42.0 ± 10.7 vs. 70.6 ± 11.6; p= 0.02) and psychological well-being (40.4 ± 14.6 vs. 78.0 ± 17.3; p= 0.03) were observed after lymphatic reconstructive surgery. CONCLUSION: The German version of The LYMPH Q Upper Extremity Module is conceptually equivalent to the original English version. It is a reliable and valid PROM to assess physical and psychological impairments in patients with UEL.