Your search

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Chronic edema in the lower extremities leads to significant negative effects on the quality of life, body image perception, satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-esteem of affected individuals. The aim of this study was to evaluate body image, quality of life, and related factors in patients with chronic lower extremity edema due to lymphedema and lipedema. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 14 lymphedema and 12 lipedema patients receiving treatment at the lymphedema unit. Individuals aged 18–65 years with a confirmed diagnosis were enrolled; those with active infections, malignancies, or systemic diseases were excluded. Body image, dysfunctional thoughts about appearance, and quality of life were evaluated using the Body Cathexis Scale, Beliefs About Appearance Scale, and Lymphedema Quality of Life scale. Circumference measurements of the lower extremities were taken before and after 20 sessions of manual lymphatic drainage therapy. Quantitative data were analyzed to compare the two groups and assess correlations between clinical and psychosocial parameters. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the lymphedema and lipedema groups in terms of age, body mass index, or pre-treatment Body Cathexis Scale, Beliefs About Appearance Scale, and Lymphedema Quality of Life scale scores (p>0.05). After 20 sessions of manual lymphatic drainage therapy, both groups showed reductions in limb circumference measurements (p<0.05). Reductions in limb size were moderately associated with improvements in Body Cathexis Scale and Lymphedema Quality of Life scale scores (p<0.05). Post-treatment improvements in body image and quality of life scores were observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that patients with lower extremity lymphedema and lipedema experience significant body image disturbances and reduced quality of life. Manual lymphatic drainage therapy improves limb circumference, body image, and quality of life.

DiVA portal is a finding tool for research publications and student theses written at the following 50 universities and research institutions.

Lipedema is characterized by symmetrical accumulation of subcutaneous fat in the lower and upper limbs, sparing the trunk, feet and hands. Although diagnosis is primarily clinical, ultrasound has proven to be a valuable, non-invasive, reproducible, and cost-effective tool for the assessment of lipedema. Ultrasound (US) facilitates diagnosis through quantitative evaluation of subcutaneous tissue thickness and enables qualitative Lipedema Dermal and Hypodermal Classification (LDHC), with morphological changes. The presence of hyperechoic nodules in patients with lipedema has been previously described and classified as LDHC 3; recently, a case report analyzing the microscopic features of such nodules demonstrated hemorrhagic areas and steatonecrosis, resulting from disorganized hypodermal expansion leading to increased pressure within the subcutaneous compartment—causing hypoxia and stimulating immature neovascularization (fragile wall, predisposing to hemorrhage). However, these nodules are not uniform and exhibit different morphologies, enabling subclassification. The first type presents with poorly defined margins; the second is well-defined margins; the third has an anechoic area, and the fourth shows a faint posterior shadow. These different nodule presentations in lipedema may be correlated with evolutionary stages or previously described clinical presentations, requiring future correlation with pathological anatomy or other diagnostic methods.

This study aims to present the results and limitations of surgery for lower limb lipoedema and lymphedema in a resource-limited surgical setting. This was a cross-sectional, analytical, prospective, in-hospital study covering 15 years. We surgically treated 119 patients, including 18 with lipoedema (15.1%), 69 with stage 2 lymphedema (57.9%), and 32 with elephantiasis (26.9%). We included 81 women (68%) and 38 men (31.9%). The majority (57.7%) of patients with lymphedema were between 30 and 49 years of age. Plastic and excisional surgery was performed in 42.2% of patients with stage 2 lymphedema and in 87.5% with stage 3 (elephantiasis). Lipoedema surgery consisted primarily of liposuction (77.7%). No lymphatic network reconstruction was performed. Our results, at 2 years' post-surgery, were very satisfactory, with limb symmetry in 83.3% of patients operated on for lipoedema, in 84.2% of patients operated on for stage 2 lymphedema, and in 85% of patients operated on for elephantiasis. Surgery for lower limb lipoedema, lymphedema, and elephantiasis is feasible in a resource-limited setting, although challenges remain. The lack of lymphatic network reconstruction constitutes our limitations. Microsurgery is necessary for optimal results.

Dr. Allen and Dr. Hines pioneered and first described lipedema in the 1940s, a common subcutaneous adipose tissue disorder characterized by enlargement of both lower extremities. Lipedema is not edema; it is a genetically determined disturbance in adipose tissue mass and adipose tissue distribution. In 1951 a second seminal paper provided more description of lipedema. Fat distribution involves the lower extremities, upper arms, hips, buttocks, thighs, sparing trunks, and feet. Lower extremities are characterized by pain, easy bruisability, firm subcutaneous nodules of adipose tissue, and resistance of fat to traditional diet and exercise.

Background: Lipedema is a chronic condition characterized by abnormal deposition of subcutaneous adipose tissue, leading to pain. The lack of internationally recognized diagnostic criteria complicates the characterization of pain. Physiological parameters such as pain pressure threshold (PPT) represent promising prognostic markers for diagnosing lipedema, yet they remain understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of two pain pressure measurements, PPT and the hand-held sphygmomanometer (HHS) in lipedema.Methods: A total of 28 adult females diagnosed with lipedema were recruited. Both PPT, using a digital algometer, and HHS, using a manual aneroid HHS, were performed to assess pain in the lower limbs. The testing was performed in a standing position with PPT and HHS placed on the calf. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were employed to assess the within session reliability, while the validity between PPT and HHS was analyzed using R2 in a linear regression model.Results: The results showed excellent reliability for both PPT and HHS, with ICC indicating high consistency (ICC = 0.93 to 0.97) and CV showing acceptable scores (CV = 3.62% to 9.06%). In addition, good validity between PPT and HHS was also observed (R2 = 0.69 to 0.74), suggesting that HHS can be a reliable alternative to PPT for pain assessment in lipedema.Conclusion: These findings have important clinical implications, as they expand the knowledge of pain characterization in people with lipedema, potentially aiding in diagnostic refinement. In addition, a cost-effective and accessible method for assessing pain was examined (i.e., HHS), showing promising findings and providing an objective method to help diagnose lipedema.

Liposuction has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative in patients with lipedema. It positively impacts clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

<span><b>Background:</b> Lipedema is a subcutaneous adipose tissue disorder mainly affecting women. Its progressive nature often requires high-volume liposuction for efficient pain reduction. However, aspiration volumes of more than 5 L within a single session may lead to a variety of complications. Thus,</span> …

This study explored experienced weight stigma, internalised weight bias and depressive symptom severity in lipoedema, a chronic health condition that primarily affects women and involves painful and disproportionate adipose tissue. This study utilised an international cross-sectional online survey i …

Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects 537 million people as of 2021, and is projected to rise to 783 million by 2045. This positions DM as the ninth leading cause of death globally. Among DM patients, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality. Notably, the prevalence rate …

Lipedema is a lipodystrophic disease that is typically characterized by a marked increase in lower-body subcutaneous adipose tissue that is purported to have increased inflammation and fibrosis, impaired microvascular/lymphatic circulation and to be resistant to reduction by weight loss therapy. However, these outcomes have not been adequately studied. We evaluated body composition, insulin sensitivity, metabolic health and adipose tissue biology in women with obesity and lipedema (Obese-LIP) before and after moderate (~9%) diet-induced weight loss. At baseline, people with Obese-LIP had ~23% greater leg fat mass, ~11% lower android-to-gynoid ratio and ~48% greater insulin sensitivity (all P&lt;0.05) than women matched on age, BMI and whole-body adiposity. In Obese-LIP, macrophage content and expression of genes involved in inflammation and fibrosis were greater, whereas lymph/angiogenesis-related genes were lower in thigh than abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue. Weight loss improved insulin sensitivity and decreased total fat mass, with similar relative reductions in abdominal and leg fat masses, but without changes in markers of inflammation and fibrosis. These results demonstrate that affected adipose tissue in women with lipedema is characterized by increased inflammation and fibrogenesis, and alterations in lymphatic and vascular biology. Moderate diet-induced weight loss improves metabolic function and decreases lower-body adipose tissue mass.

<p>The average values of CR-PCSS (T1), CR-PCSS (T2) and CR-PCSS (T3) over all participants were 2.22±0.82, 1.18±0.77, and 0.84±0.77, respectively, which corresponded to the skin improvement between T1 and T2 of 0.93±0.27 (p < 0.0001) as well as between T1 and T3 of 1.38±0.47 (p < 0.0001). Assessm</p> …

Routine cold-water immersion (CWI) is typically suggested to reduce inflammation, a hallmark property of lipedema. Lipedema is a connective tissue disorder with a genetic component that presents with a disproportionate distribution of nodules in the extremities. This case report explores the impact …

This case report explores the use of radio electric asymmetric conveyor (REAC) technology for chronic pain management, functional limitations, and metabolic dysfunction in a 67-year-old female with rheumatoid arthritis, advanced lipedema, and ...

Introduction Lipoedema is a congenital fat distribution disorder. It leads to a pathological increase in adipose tissue due to a hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the adipocytes. Currently, the disease affects about 10% of women. A common treatment of the disease is liposuction to remove the pathologic fat cells. Patients and Methods A total of 47 patients (mean age: 62.00 ± 12.96 years) were treated with the conventional tumescent liposuction and 25 patients (mean age of 45.16 ± 12.87 years) with Waterjet-assisted liposuction (WAL), a gentle, tissue-conserving method which washes out fat cells. WAL is thought to cause less damage to surrounding tissue than tumescent liposuction and thus, less trauma. Results The postoperative level the C-reactive protein was significantly (p* = 0.0195) lower after WAL treatment, implying a lower inflammation level than after tumescent liposuction. Also, a decrease of electrolytes such as potassium in the blood serum was observed in some cases. The postoperative potassium level dropped by 0.30 ± 0.24mmol/l, a value which was significantly lower in WAL treated patients where the level dropped by 0.47 ± 0.31mmol/l. The mean fat aspirate using the conventional tumescent method was 3,302.13 ± 1,345.89ml and 3,727.08 ± 151.96ml with the WAL treatment. Conclusions: WAL is a tissue-conserving method that washes out fat cells with less trauma to surrounding tissue as observed with conventional tumescent liposuction. WAL causes a lower inflammation level but higher loss of potassium ions. This latter aspect needs attention after the liposuction treatment.

Background:  Lower limb swelling presents a diagnostic challenge with diverse causes, including well-known issues like venous insufficiency and lymphedema, and less-understood conditions like lipedema. Lipedema, involving abnormal fat accumulation in the lower extremities, is frequently misdiagnosed, posing challenges for affected individuals. This research aimed to report and analyze the clinical features of patients presenting with the complaint of lipedema. Methods:  A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia from April to November 2023, involving adult patients from a specialized clinic in lipedema and lymphedema management. Data were collected through clinical evaluation and a comprehensive data collection sheet. Results:  In a cohort of 115 female patients (mean age: 38.58), the most common age for disease onset was around 20–29 years. Physical examinations revealed symmetric enlargement (88%), collar sign (43%), orthostatic nonpitting edema (49%), and telangiectasia (64%). Varicose veins were present in 36%, Stemmer signs in 2%, and foot edema in 13%. Clinical diagnosis with lipedema occurred in 71%, with grade 2 (31%) as the most common severity and type 3 (47%) as the prevalent disease type. Conclusions:  The current study, the first of its kind in the Middle East and specifically in Saudi Arabia, emphasizes the urgency of increased awareness and intervention due to a high underdiagnosis rate in lipedema. The observed complexity in symptoms and correlations between severity, lymphatic impairment, and body mass index underscore lipedema’s multifaceted nature. Future research should explore regional and cultural influences and conduct larger studies to validate and recognize various lipedema features.

Introduction Lipedema is a relatively common, frequently misdiagnosed, chronic condition often treated by liposuction when conservative therapies fail. Techniques such as traditional tumescent liposuction (TTL), power-assisted liposuction (PAL), and water-jet-assisted liposuction (WAL), are popular surgical interventions, although it is unclear how these techniques compare. This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of liposuction in patients with lipedema. Methods Relevant English lipedema studies published in PubMed from January 2003 to April 2023 were identified. Ten articles with postoperative outcomes and complications data were included (2 TTL, 5 PAL, 1 WAL, 2 articles used both PAL and WAL). Results were summarized using descriptive statistics, and a randomized effects model was used to evaluate heterogeneity. Results A total of 2,542 procedures in 906 patients were included. Combined outcomes for all techniques significantly improved pain, bruising, edema, tension, pressure sensitivity, cosmetic impairment, and general impairment (all P < 0.00001). Results for TTL, PAL, and WAL led to significant improvements in pain reduction (P = 0.0005), bruising, swelling, pressure sensitivity, or cosmetic impairment (all P < 0.05). WAL more effectively reduced tension and general impairment (all P < 0.005), but heterogeneity for these outcomes was high. Overall complication rates were low for studies that utilized TTL (1.5%), PAL (4.0%), WAL (0%), and both PAL and WAL (2.3%). Conclusion Liposuction techniques, including TTL, PAL, and WAL, result in significant symptom improvement in lipedema patients with a relatively low complication rate. WAL may potentially result in a more substantial reduction of tension and general impairment with fewer complications; however, only a single study performed this method of liposuction exclusively. This is the first meta-analysis investigating liposuction data in lipedema treatment.