Your search

Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects 537 million people as of 2021, and is projected to rise to 783 million by 2045. This positions DM as the ninth leading cause of death globally. Among DM patients, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality. Notably, the prevalence rate …

Abstract Background Lipedema is a chronic, incurable disorder characterized by painful fat accumulation in the extremities. While the application of liposuction in lipedema management has become increasingly popular, the safety and effectiveness of this approach remain contentious. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess various liposuction modalities in lipedema management to verify their safety and efficacy. Methods In-line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a comprehensive literature review from inception until March 2023 using the following electronic databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. Results From the 562 initially identified articles, 20 met our inclusion/exclusion criteria for evaluation. Our review encompassed 14 prospective cohort studies, 3 retrospective studies, 2 case series, and 1 cross-sectional study. A meta-analysis of nine articles revealed a notable improvement in the quality of life, pain, pressure sensitivity, bruising, cosmetic impairment, heaviness, walking difficulty, and itching among lipedema patients who underwent liposuction. Although complications such as inflammation, thrombosis, seroma, hematoma, and lymphedema-related skin changes were reported, severe complications were rare. Crucially, no instances of shock, recurrence, or mortality were reported. Conclusion Liposuction is a safe and beneficial therapeutic intervention for managing lipedema symptoms and enhancing quality of life. However, the impact of liposuction on secondary lymphedema remains unreported in the literature. Further high-quality, large-scale trials are necessary to assess the safety and effectiveness of different liposuction modalities. These studies will contribute valuable insights to optimize liposuction as a therapeutic option for individuals with lipedema. Level of Evidence I, risk/prognostic study.

Lipedema, a chronic and painful disorder primarily affecting women without a definitive cure, has traditionally been managed with conservative therapy, notably complete decongestive therapy, across many countries. Recently, liposuction has been explored as a potential surgical treatment, prompting this study to evaluate its effectiveness as possibly the first-line therapy for lipedema. Through extensive literature searches in databases such as CrossRef, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar up to December 2023, and using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment, the study selected seven studies for inclusion. Results showed significant post-operative improvements in spontaneous pain, edema, bruising, mobility, and quality of life among lipedema patients undergoing liposuction. However, over half of the patients still required conservative therapy after surgery. Despite these promising results, the study suggests caution due to lipedema's complexity, significant reliance on self-reported data, and limitations of the studies reviewed. Thus, while liposuction may offer symptomatic relief, it should be considered an adjunct, experimental therapy rather than a definitive cure, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to care.

Introdução: O lipedema, recentemente introduzido na 11ª revisão da Classificação Internacional de Doenças. Estima-se que metade das pessoas acometidas pelo lipedema, estejam em sobrepeso ou com obesidade, sendo uma associação de comorbidades que dificulta o diagnóstico. O diagnóstico errôneo é preocupante, pois atrasa o tratamento da doença permitindo a sua progressão. Objetivo: Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura (RIL) com objetivo de analisar o que se tem construído em pesquisas anteriores relacionadas ao lipedema. Metodologia: A busca dos artigos científicos foram os disponibilizados nos Periódicos da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). Os artigos constassem os Descritores em Ciências da Saúde (DeCS) com as palavras: lipedema and procedimento and cirurgia and mulher, e que fossem revisados por pares, nas línguas inglesa e portuguesa. a partir da aplicação dos critérios previamente definidos O período de busca foi realizado nos meses de maio a agosto de 2023. Resultados e Discussão: Foram elegíveis 12 artigos. A análise dos artigos encontrados possibilitou a evidente necessidade de conhecimento e clareza no diagnóstico do lipedema. As mulheres são as mais afetadas pela doença. A área afetada pode incluir os quadris, as pernas bilateral e simetricamente. E uma das principais características distintivas do lipedema é a preservação dos pés, o que pode criar um degrau distinto no tornozelo. Assim, a importância do diagnóstico diferencial. O procedimento cirúrgico como tratamento apresentou melhores resultados. Entretanto, a associação de todos os tratamentos sobressaiu na qualidade de melhora dos aspectos do lipedema. Conclusão: Essa revisão apontou para o complexo  diagnóstico do lipedema.  Esse assunto persiste como um desafio e deve instigar mais pesquisadores na busca para um diagnóstico preciso, opções de tratamento e até mesmo no sentido de prevenção para satisfazer a população assistida, no caso a maioria são as mulheres.  A melhor opção indicada pelos estudos analisados foi o tratamento cirúrgico realizado pela lipoaspiração.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema, a complex and enigmatic adipose tissue disorder, remains poorly understood despite its significant impact on the patients' quality of life. Genetic investigations have uncovered potential contributors to its pathogenesis, including somatic mutations, which are nonheritable genetic alterations that can play a pivotal role in the development of this disease. AIM: This review aims to elucidate the role of somatic mutations in the etiology of lipedema by examining their implications in adipose tissue biology, inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction. RESULTS: Studies focusing on leukocyte clones, genetic alterations like TET2 and DNMT3A, and the intricate interplay between adipose tissue and other organs have shed light on the underlying mechanisms driving lipedema. From the study of the scientific literature, mutations to genes correlated to three main pathways could be involved in the somatic development of lipedema: genes related to mitochondrial activity, genes related to localized disorders of subcutaneous adipose tissue, and genes of leukocyte clones. CONCLUSIONS: The insights gained from these diverse studies converge to highlight the complex genetic underpinnings of lipedema and offer potential avenues for therapeutic interventions targeting somatic mutations to alleviate the burden of this condition on affected individuals.

Background Lipedema is a loose connective tissue disease characterized by a disproportionate accumulation of adipose tissue in the limbs of women. Despite its incidence of 10-20%, lipedema is often underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed. Objectives This review aims to outline current available evidence regarding this enigmatic syndrome and gives a synopsis on the subjects that are still unknown. Materials and Methods PubMed and Embase searches were conducted to identify relevant articles on lipedema pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Results Lipedema can be considered a disease of the adipocytes or a circulatory disorder of the lymphatics. The relationship between lymphatics and adipose tissue remains controversial. The clinical distinction between lipedema, lymphedema, phlebolymphedema and lipolymphedema can be difficult. Diagnoses often coexist, further complicating the diagnosis of lipedema, which is currently made on clinical grounds alone. The value of diagnostic imaging studies is unclear. Liposuction appears to be an effective treatment and significantly improves symptoms. Conclusion Diagnosing lipedema remains a challenge due to its heterogeneous presentation, co-existing diseases, and the lack of objective diagnostic imaging. Further directions for research include the effect of excess skin resection surgery on lymphatic drainage.

The disease "Lipedema", which has been known since 1940, is increasingly better understood. Dimpled edema in particular is not significant in women with fat distribution disorders on the arms and legs. These and other scientific findings are "work in progress" with the aim of renaming the disease. A "proper name" is "Lipohyperplasia dolorosa" (LiDo). With LiDo, the increase in volume is genetically fixed, but the pain is dynamically progressive. A LiDo must be distinguished from other symmetrical, painless fat distribution disorders on the arms and legs at first sight and after palpatory examination, especially from the occasionally coincident obesity. Obesity is never comorbid, but often coincident with LiDo. Although physical activity and a change in diet can reduce obesity, they cannot eliminate the disproportionate increase in fat tissue on the extremities that is exclusively caused by LiDo. In LiDo patients coincident with obesity, gastric surgery has no effect on the obligatory pain. There are both conservative and surgical treatment options for LiDo. A procedure that has been established since 1997 is surgical treatment using lymphological liposculpture. As part of this operation, large wounds are created under the skin, which, according to the "Rules of Nine" when treating both arms in one session and the suction of the legs in 2 sessions per operation, correspond to an area of ​​18% of the body surface. However, with adequate postoperative management and the administration of antibiotics and antithrombotics, local complications associated with the operation are rare. The most important result of consistent surgical treatment of lipohyperplasia dolorosa is the impact on quality of life: "It ruined her life" becomes "It improves her life".

As overweight and obesity rates have increased worldwide, the prevalence of metabolic disorders has also grown. Due to the lack of physiologically relevant adipose tissue platforms, research in adipose tissue biology has relied on animal models, leading to false conclusions on pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic efficacy. Despite the urgent need for an adipose tissue model, it is still extremely difficult to cultivate mature adipocytes and recapitulate multi-cellular interactions in adipose tissue in vitro. For this reason, adipose tissue modeling requires new technologies that allow better culture conditions for adipocytes and contain a complex network of microenvironments. Herein, we discuss recent technologies, including 3-dimensional (3D) adipocyte spheroids, biomaterial-based 3D culture, 3D bioprinting, and microphysiological systems, which may offer new opportunities to discover drugs targeting adipose tissue.

Steroid hormones synchronize a variety of functions throughout all stages of life. Importantly, steroid hormone-transforming enzymes are ultimately responsible for the regulation of these potent signaling molecules. Germline mutations that cause dysfunction in these enzymes cause a variety of endocrine disorders. Mutations in SRD5A2, HSD17B3, and HSD3B2 genes that lead to disordered sexual development, salt wasting, and other severe disorders provide a glimpse of the impacts of mutations in steroid hormone transforming enzymes. In a departure from these established examples, this review examines disease-associated germline coding mutations in steroid-transforming members of the human aldo-keto reductase (AKR) superfamily. We consider two main categories of missense mutations: those resulting from nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) and cases resulting from familial inherited base pair substitutions. We found mutations in human AKR1C genes that disrupt androgen metabolism, which can affect male sexual development and exacerbate prostate cancer and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Others may be disease causal in the AKR1D1 gene that is responsible for bile acid deficiency. However, given the extensive roles of AKRs in steroid metabolism, we predict that with expanding publicly available data and analysis tools, there is still much to be uncovered regarding germline AKR mutations in disease.

When studying the current literature, one might get the impression that lipedema is a “modern” disease, with increasing incidence and augmenting prevalence throughout Western countries during the last decade. However, a quick look into older textbooks shows that disproportionate accumulation of fat in female bodies has long been known without being recognized as an independent disease. Nevertheless, it was not until 1940 that Allen and Hines described a “syndrome characterized by fat legs and orthostatic edema” in a seminal publication. The mere awareness that people who have lipedema are not just overweight but suffer from a yet poorly defined pathological condition, may be considered a decisive leap forward in the understanding of lipedema. A number of comprehensive publications have since dealt with the clinical presentation of lipedema and have provided the first clues towards the potential pathological mechanisms underlying its initiation and progression. Nevertheless, despite all effort that has been undertaken to unravel lipedema pathology, many questions have remained unanswered. What can be deduced with certainty from all experimental and medical evidence available so far is that lipedema is neither a cosmetic problem nor is it a problem of lifestyle but should be accepted as a serious disease with yet undetermined genetic background, which makes women’s lives unbearable from both a physical and psychological point of view. To date, results from clinical inspections have led to the categorization of various types and stages of lipedema, describing how the extremities are affected and evaluating its progression, as demonstrated by skin alterations, adipose tissue volume increase and physical and everyday-behavioral impediments. There is accumulating evidence showing that advanced stages of lipedema are usually accompanied by excessive weight or obesity. Thus, it is not unreasonable to assume that the progression of lipedema is largely driven by weight gain and the pathological alterations associated with it. Similarly, secondary lymphedema is frequently found in lipedema patients at advanced stages. Needless to say, both conditions considerably blur the clinical presentation of lipedema, making diagnosis difficult and scientific research challenging. The present literature review will focus on lipedema research, based on evidence fromex vivo and in vitro data, which has accumulated throughout the last few decades. We will also open the discussion as to whether the currently used categorization of lipedema stages is still sufficient and up-to-date for the accurate description of this enigmatic disease, whose name, strangely enough, does not match its pathologic correlate.

Lipoedema is a painful non-pitting diffuse “fatty” swelling, usually confined to the legs, that occurs mainly in women. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the available research on the functioning of people with lipoedema, according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Relevant publications and gray literature were retrieved until October 2022. The results sections of each publication were organized using a thematic framework approach. All included studies reported at least one outcome fitting within the domains of body functions and body structures, with most studies focusing on the categories of “sensation of pain”, “immunological system functions”, and “weight maintenance functions”. The ICF domains of activities and participation and environmental factors were mentioned in a small number of the included studies (17 and 13%, respectively), while the domain of personal factors was studied in half of the included studies. In conclusion, the emphasis of lipoedema research is on its description from a disorder-oriented point of view in the form of body functions and body structures, with a lack of information about the other domains of functioning.

Often regarded as the forgotten second circulatory system, the lymphatic system is critical in working with the venous and arterial system to maintain fluid equilibrium, circulate cells and signaling molecules in the immune system, and transport fat molecules and nutrients. When there is an alteration in the flow of lymphatic fluid, lymphedema is the result, usually manifesting as significant swelling of a particular region of the body with protein-rich fluid accumulation in the interstitial spaces. The result of this disease ranges from psychological disturbance to significant disability and morbidity, even leading to aggressive malignancy. The prevalence of lymphedema is in the hundreds of millions worldwide; however, it is routinely under-diagnosed and under-recognized as a disease, especially in the United States. Treatment rates for lymphedema are variable, ranging from low rates of treatment in non-cancer etiologies, to high treatment rates seen in breast cancer related etiologies. Furthermore, treatment modalities are equally notorious for being unsuccessful, either as a result of non-compliance or lack of efficacious therapeutic techniques, or a combination of both. There is no cure for lymphedema and treatment mainly focuses on minimizing limb swelling, maintaining functionality, and preventative treatments to reduce complications.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nuclear medicine is an essential tool in the delivery of high-quality medical care, going beyond simple anatomical imaging to the use of physiological processes for both imaging and therapy. Nuclear medicine techniques were applied to the lymphatic system as early as the 1950s by Sherman et al. (1), using 198Au colloid (a beta emitter) as a therapeutic agent for lymph node metastasis. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the ready availability of technetium-99m (99mTc) allowed more widespread lymphatic imaging (lymphoscintigraphy) with 99mTc colloid. In 1976, Ege (2) studied lymphatic flow in 848 patients, suggesting lymphoscintigraphy could demonstrate variable lymphatic drainage patterns, therefore allowing more accurate radiation therapy fields. In recent years, advances in radiopharmaceuticals and imaging technology have allowed more accurate localization of lymph nodes during lymphoscintigraphy and the development of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept. One of the first mentions of SLN was made in 1960 by Gould and Philben (3). They described a specific location of a node that drained the parotid gland. This node, located at the junction of the anterior and posterior facial veins, was described as the node most likely to contain metastasis. It was recommended that this node be investigated first before carrying out complete node dissection (3). The SLN concept was further explored by Cabanas (4) in 1977 when lymphangiography with contrast was used to identify a specific location for lymphatic drainage from the penis. Similar to what was described by Gould and Philben, Cabanas (4) felt that this 1 specific lymph node (located at the superficial epigastric vein by Cabanas for penile carcinoma) could be defined as the SLN for all patients. Individual variations demonstrated in the lymphatic channels and the location of the sentinel node since the initial investigations have confirmed that mapping of lymphatic drainage needs to be carried out for each patient undergoing SLN sampling. SLN identification can be done with optical agents, such as isosulfan or methylene blue, as well as with radiotracers and fluorescent tracers. Localization of the SLN(s) with these techniques in individual patients has allowed a more focused investigation of nodal drainage from a primary tumor site, preventing the morbidity and mortality of complete node bed dissection in patients with no clinical evidence of tumor in the regional nodal basin (5). One difficulty with reviewing the literature describing lymphoscintigraphy is the variety of tracers in use around the world and throughout the history of lymphoscintigraphy. Smaller particles tend to move through the lymphatics more quickly. Some tracers are more likely to stop at the first node they encounter, while others are more likely to move through the lymphatic system more readily, demonstrating channels, node beds, and central lymphatic structures. The tracer used depends on the clinical indication (e.g., sentinel node scintigraphy, lymphedema, or lymphatic vessel integrity), as well as availability and local regulations. In the United States, there are only 2 tracers generally available for clinical use: 99mTc sulfur colloid and 99mTc tilmanocept. In addition, injection techniques, imaging protocols, and camera technology can vary substantially, making comparisons between studies challenging. A discussion of these technical differences is beyond the scope of this document. These appropriate use criteria (AUC) have been developed to describe the appropriate use of radiopharmaceuticals for lymphoscintigraphy in SLN mapping and lymphedema. It is hoped that through these recommendations, nuclear medicine lymphatic imaging techniques will be used to benefit patients in the most cost-effective manner. Representatives from the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the Society for Vascular Medicine (SVM), the Australia and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine (ANZSNM), the American College of Radiology (ACR), the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS), the American College of Nuclear Medicine (ACNM), and the American College of Surgeons (ACS) assembled as an autonomous workgroup to develop these AUC. This process was performed in accordance with the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (6). This legislation requires that all referring physicians consult AUC by using a clinical decision support mechanism before ordering any advanced diagnostic imaging services. Such services are defined as diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and nuclear medicine procedures, including positron emission tomography (PET) and others, as specified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in consultation with physician specialty organizations and other stakeholders (3). Lymphoscintigraphy usually causes trivial radiation exposures for the patient, the surgeon, and the staff handling any specimens that may contain radioactivity. Local regulations that address the handling of radiopharmaceuticals and exposure of the public should always be followed. Radiation exposures are also trivial for pregnant patients and infants exposed to someone who has been injected with lymphoscintigraphic agents labeled with 99mTc. The amount of radiopharmaceutical transferred from the interstitium into the blood and from the blood to the milk is very low. However, when performing an SLN procedure for breast cancer, it seems prudent to recommend the interruption of direct breastfeeding for 24 hours after administration of the radiopharmaceutical. There is a potential for more fetal or infant exposure if the radioisotope dissociates from the radiopharmaceutical; however, exposures will remain very small and likely of no consequence. The rapid decay of 99mTc (6-hour half-life) also allows for rapid return of radiation exposures to background levels within a short time. More detailed information can be found in the document “Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of Isotopes (ACMUI) Sub-Committee on Nursing Mother Guidelines for the Medical Administration of Radioactive Materials” (https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1803/ML18033B034.pdf).

Lipedema is a pathology of the adipose tissue, in evident female prevalence, diagnosed clinically and still of not well-defined etiopathogenesis. Indeed, an estrogen-related component is present, and an inflammatory state and a condition of edema are present in most cases; even pain seems to be a recurring feature, and insulin resistance is also often associated with lipedema. The therapeutic approach is finally becoming holistic. Therefore, with surgery, physiotherapy, and elastic compression therapy, the nutritional aspect of food supplementation is gaining much value. The objective of the present work is to consider the nutritional supplements that could be useful to manage this condition, underlining that, at the moment, the specific literature is practically non-existent. The most promising supplements seem to be omega 3 fish oil, polyphenols, and vitamin C, but the need for studies in this sector is urgent.

The most relevant hallmarks of cellulite include a massive protrusion of superficial adipose tissue into the dermis, reduced expression of the extracellular glycoprotein fibulin-3, and an unusually high presence of MUSE cells in gluteofemoral white adipose tissue (gfWAT) that displays cellulite. Also typical for this condition is the hypertrophic nature of the underlying adipose tissue, the interaction of adipocytes with sweat glands, and dysfunctional lymph and blood circulation as well as a low-grade inflammation in the areas of gfWAT affected by cellulite. Here, we propose a new pathophysiology of cellulite, which connects this skin condition with selective accumulation of endogenous lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in gfWAT. The accumulation of LPS within a specific WAT depot has so far not been considered as a possible pathophysiological mechanism triggering localized WAT modifications, but may very well be involved in conditions such as cellulite and, secondary to that, lipedema.

An abstract is unavailable.

Das Lipödem ist eine sehr komplexe, unvermutet häufig anzutreffende Erkrankung des Fettsystems der Extremitäten. Es handelt sich hier um ein lymphologisches Krankheitsbild, wobei besonders das Baufett betroffen ist. Nur in wenigen Fällen ist es auch mit metabolischen Symptomen assoziiert. Das Lipödem ist eine Sonderform der Adipositas, die weder in der Medizin noch in der Bevölkerung als bewegungs- und diätresistent wahrgenommen wird. Die betroffenen Patienten sind in ihrem seelischen Gleichgewicht äußerst betroffen. Aufgrund unserer anatomischen Untersuchungen kann man durchaus von einer ernsthaften, progressiven Erkrankung des subkutanen Fettgewebes und der benachbarten, assoziierten Strukturen sprechen. Es ist nicht nur die Klinik, sondern auch die duplexsonographische Evaluierung und impedanzanalytische Exploration sind zur Diagnosefindung und zur postoperativen Verlaufskontrolle notwendig. Auch bestätigt ein besonderes Verhalten der Stammzellen den Pathomechanismus. Durch Ausdünnung der Dermis und Verlust der elastischen Fasern sind dermatologische Problemstellungen wie Trockenheit, Infektneigung, Vulnerabilität und Neigung zu Ekchymosen erklärbar. Hier dürfte v. a. die Funktion des dermalen Fettes beeinträchtigt sein. Aus unseren Beobachtungen geht hervor, dass insbesondere die frühzeitige operative Therapie mittels Liposuktion einen nachhaltigen Wert für Patienten im Frühstadium hat und den Patienten eine deutliche Verbesserung der Lebensqualität bringt.

A 2022 UK guideline recommends that the liposuction procedure for treatment of lipedema should only be used in the context of research because of inadequate efficacy and safety data. A 2021 US guideline recognizes that liposuction is currently the only available technique for removing abnormal lipedema tissue. The guideline has a series of consensus statements on patient selection, indications for liposuction, prevention of procedure-related adverse events, and pre- and post-surgical management. There were no recent studies on the clinical effectiveness of liposuction compared with no treatment or to alternative treatments for the treatment of lipedema.