Your search

Objectives This double-blind, randomized clinical trial sought to demonstrate the effectiveness of Pycnogenol® in the symptomatic control and body composition management of patients with lipedema. Methods This was a double-blind, randomized clinical trial with 60 days of follow-up involving one hundred patients. The study utilized a quality-of-life questionnaire (QuASiL), bioimpedance analysis, and clinical monitoring. Results Of the one hundred patients initially included, seven were lost to follow-up; however, monotonic multiple imputation was applied for data analysis. The two groups were similar in all aspects except for initial weight. The placebo group showed an increase in mean QuASiL scores after 30 and 60 days from the first assessment, representing a worsening of symptoms over time. In contrast, the intervention group demonstrated a progressive and significant reduction in scores, with means of 69.5 ± 28 at 30 days and 63.2 ± 27 at 60 days (p < 0.001). This group also showed a statistically significant reduction in weight, BMI, and body fat percentage. Conclusions Pycnogenol® appears to be a promising therapeutic option to support the clinical management of lipedema, a condition that exerts numerous negative physical and emotional impacts throughout the lives of affected patients.

Background/Objectives: Lipedema is a chronic disorder characterized by disproportionate fat accumulation in the extremities, causing pain, bruising, and reduced mobility. When conservative therapy fails, liposuction is considered an effective treatment option. Prior studies often relied on subjective or non-standardized measures, limiting precision. This study aimed to objectively assess volumetric changes after liposuction in stage III lipedema using high-resolution 3D imaging to quantify postoperative changes in circumference and volume, providing individualized yet standardized outcome measures aligned with precision medicine. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 66 patients who underwent 161 water-assisted liposuctions (WALs). Pre- and postoperative measurements were performed with the VECTRA© WB360 system, allowing reproducible, anatomically specific quantification of limb volumes and circumferences. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital complications. Results: Liposuction achieved significant reductions in all treated regions, most pronounced in the proximal thigh and upper arm. Thigh volume decreased by 4.10–9.25% (q < 0.001), while upper arm volume decreased by 15.63% (left) and 20.15% (right) (q = 0.001). Circumference decreased by up to 5.2% in the thigh (q < 0.001) and 12.27% (q = 0.001) in the upper arm. All changes were calculated relative to baseline values, allowing personalized interpretation of treatment effects. Conclusions: This is the first study to objectively quantify postoperative lipedema changes using whole-body 3D surface imaging. By capturing each patient’s contours pre- and postoperatively, this approach enables individualized evaluation while permitting standardized comparison across patients. It offers a precise understanding of surgical outcomes and supports integration of precision medicine principles in lipedema surgery.

Lipedema is a chronic and potentially progressive fat distribution disorder. Disease-related symptoms, such as pain and discomfort, can require surgical intervention when conservative therapies are exhausted. These megaliposuctions are functional in nature and need to be distinguished from esthetic liposuctions. This new surgical approach, the hybrid technique combining power-assisted liposuction (PAL) with manual extraction (ME), has been developed to more effectively treat fibrotic nodules, particularly in the lower legs, where conventional liposuction techniques often fall short.

Background/Objectives: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by disproportionate fat accumulation and inflammation, predominantly affecting women. While recent evidence suggests a systemic pro-inflammatory state in lipedema, the role of diet in modulating inflammation remains underexplored. This study assessed the anti-inflammatory potential of a Mediterranean-style ketogenic diet and its effects after 7 months of adherence on systemic inflammation markers (CRP and IL-6) in women with lipedema (n = 24) and a control group with overweight/obesity (n = 24). Methods: The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) was used to characterize the inflammatory potential of the diet throughout the intervention. Dietary intake was analyzed pre- and post-intervention, and anthropometric, body composition, and biochemical parameters were measured. Results: Beyond its beneficial effects on body composition (significant reductions in body weight, fat, leg circumferences, and visceral fat), the intervention diet also demonstrated anti-inflammatory potential. In lipedema, baseline diet showed a pro-inflammatory DII profile (DII/day = 3.04), which was reduced by about 1.5 points after the intervention (p = 0.008). When expressed per 1000 kcal, the DII values were markedly lower for both baseline (DII = 0.22) and intervention diet (DII = ~0.01). Following the intervention diet, reduction in CRP (-0.39, p = 0.016) and IL-6 levels (-0.33, p = 0.034) in lipedema were observed. A significant positive association was observed between the intervention diet's DII and CRP (r = 0.55, p = 0.005), and between the baseline diet's DII and IL-6 (r = 0.50, p = 0.013) in lipedema group. Conclusions: These findings suggest that ketogenic diet rich in anti-inflammatory and antioxidant nutrients can reduce systemic inflammation in lipedema patients, independently of caloric restriction.

Lipedema is a chronic, progressive adipose connective tissue disorder characterized by symmetrical, disproportionate fat accumulation, typically affecting the lower extremities and arms, accompanied by pain, swelling, and a sensation of heaviness. This study introduces intermediate Stages 1.5 and 2.5 to the established lipedema classification (Stages 1, 2 and 3), and other affected areas, based on physical examination, a questionnaire, and photographic documentation. Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy (BIS) was employed to quantify total body water (TBW) across stages. A significant and linear increase in BMI was observed from Stage 1 to 3, correlating with increased reported pain and heaviness in the thighs, calves, and upper arms. Systemic symptoms of brain fog, debilitating fatigue, and hypothermia were significantly prevalent. TBW demonstrated a significant, stage-dependent increase in the lower extremities. Adipose tissue accumulation over the knees and feet significantly increased with lipedema stage. In contrast, shin involvement was evident in early stages and remained consistently elevated throughout later stages. Skeletal Muscle Mass (SMM) exhibited a significant increase across lipedema stages, positively correlating with fat mass (FM) in Stage 3. This study elucidates previously underrecognized clinical features and distribution patterns of lipedema, offering a refined staging system to improve understanding of its progression and burden.

Objectives To identify research priorities related to the diagnosis, treatment and management of lipoedema. Design This was a research question priority-setting that ensured the involvement of patients, relatives and healthcare professionals in all parts. It consisted of the following steps: identifying research questions through an open survey, seeking input from patients, patient relatives and healthcare professionals. Prioritisation, including a Delphi exercise and a final priority-setting meeting. Setting Swedish healthcare and community. Participants A total of 255 participants submitted research questions. 130 participated in the prioritisation of the submitted questions. Of these, 89 were patients, 10 were relatives, 19 were healthcare professionals and 12 were representatives of patient organisations. Results 1314 potential research questions were submitted; 62 unique questions remained after analysis. 130 and 123 people answered the first and second Delphi surveys, respectively. 20 questions were discussed by 13 participants at the final priority-setting meeting. The following five research questions were selected as a top priority: (1) what criteria should apply for a diagnosis of lipoedema? (2) What outcomes are important in lipoedema research? (3) What effect does manual treatment, such as manual lymphatic drainage have on lipoedema? (4) What effect does liposuction have on lipoedema? (5) What are the effects of hormonal treatment on lipoedema? Conclusions We found a consensus between patients and healthcare professionals on topics that warrant priority in future research into lipoedema. The questions reflect both the diagnosis of the condition and research on treatment effects. We hope the results will inform researchers and research funders, and direct future studies towards important research questions. Data are available upon reasonable request.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is an adipose tissue disorder involving mostly women. One of the most characteristic lipedema symptoms is painful accumulation of adipose tissue in lower and upper extremities leading to disproportion. Due to the disproportionate body shape, it is recently thought that BMI (Body Mass Index) might not be fully sufficient to identify the weight ratios among lipedema patients and it is suggested to consider replacing BMI with WHtR (Waist-to-height ratio). PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to present the characteristic features of lipedema patients and the usefulness of BMI and WHtR among lipedema patients in reference to symptoms severity, quality of life and body composition. METHODS: Forty-four women with lipedema were asked to rate their symptoms in a scale from 0 to 10, and to complete SF-36 questionnaire affecting quality of life. Participants also had body composition assessment. RESULTS: Participants experienced various lipedema symptoms such as: heaviness in affected areas (97.7%), pain at palpation (100%), spontaneous pain (82%), disproportionate body shape and tendency to bruising (88.6%). The level of pain was strictly correlated with patients' daily functioning (R = 0.79, p = 1.9*10- 10). The quality of life among participants measured with SF-36 was 57.4/100. WHtR enabled the same group of patients to be divided into three nearly equal groups, while BMI only divided them into two groups. Statistically significant differences could be observed both between BMI and WHtR groups. CONCLUSION: Lipedema symptoms have a direct impact on functioning of patients. Quality of life is decreased among women with lipedema. WHtR should be considered as a tool in identification of obesity among lipedema population.

Background: Lipedema is a chronic disease of subcutaneous adipose tissue that predominantly affects women and is frequently associated with endocrinopathies such as insulin resistance and obesity. Its pathogenesis is still unclear, and treatment, which requires a multi-disciplinary approach, is prolonged over time and is not always effective. There is currently no drug treatment available for this disease. Methods: Five different cases of women with lipedema and insulin resistance, treated with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and once-weekly exenatide, in association or not with lifestyle changes (diet or physical activity) for 3 to 6 months are described. Changes in anthropometric parameters, symptoms, clinical findings and the thickness of superficial adipose tissue measured by ultrasound were evaluated. Results: Treatment with exenatide, whether combined with a change in diet or physical activity, resulted in a reduction in the characteristic symptoms of lipedema, in pain evoked by pinching the adipose tissue fold and in the thickness of subcutaneous adipose tissue at the levels of the lower limbs, abdomen and upper limbs. In four out of five cases, a reduction in body weight was observed, particularly during the first three months of treatment and in cases with greater metabolic impairment. Clinical, instrumental and subjective improvements were also observed in cases where there was no reduction in body weight and in patients who had previously undergone lower limb liposuction. Conclusions: The improvement in symptoms and clinical signs of lipedema, in addition to the reduction in adipose tissue in patients with lipedema and insulin resistance with exenatide, suggests a novel pharmacological approach to the disease, which can be combined with other conservative and surgical treatments to promote weight reduction. These results also highlight the association of this disease with metabolic alterations and the fundamental role of an accurate diagnosis followed by the treatment of comorbidities and excess weight in these patients.

Lipedema is a chronic disease in adipose tissue affecting women. The distinctive body appearance in lipedema, often mistaken for obesity, may be detrimental to social life. In our online cross-sectional survey study, conducted from June to September 2021 among 245 women with lipedema, we found significantly more health-related stigma compared to an aged-matched general female population (N = 1872), leading to an overall lower quality of life. Conversely, strong social support was associated with better social and emotional functioning. As such, healthcare professionals must, even in the early stages, recognize this disease and address its impact on psychosocial health and well-being.

Lipoedema is a loose connective tissue disease primarily affecting women characterized by an abnormal build-up of painful fat in the legs and arms. In healthcare, lipoedema is often confused with obesity, and today, diagnostic tools and standardized guidelines for adequate treatments are lacking. Still, research on how affected women manage their health problems and whether they are satisfied with their care remains sparse. Therefore, this study aimed to contribute knowledge on healthcare experiences, and their use and self-reported effects of self-care and treatments among women with lipoedema.

IntroductionLipedema is a chronic and progressive adipose tissue disorder that predominantly affects women. However, despite its high prevalence and severe negative impact on quality of life, it remains significantly underdiagnosed. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge and awareness of …

This study underscores the need for tailored self-management interventions for people with lipoedema. The adaptation of existing self-management strategies from other chronic conditions should take into account the specific needs, barriers, and facilitators of people with lipoedema and their HCPs.

Background: Despite its estimated high prevalence among women and increasing awareness, lipedema remains under-investigated. Ignoring its debilitating nature, surgical treatment for this condition is frequently covered by health insurance only in advanced stages and after the exhaustion of conservative therapies. Methods: A total of 1015 patients with lipedema were recruited via social media platforms. Of these, 860 patients provided answers to at least one complete section of the modified Body-Q questionnaire (response rate 85%). The Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were utilized to assess the impact of the surgical treatment by means of patient-reported outcomes on the self-perception of various body areas. Results: The satisfaction scores among conservatively treated patients for abdominal appearance, arms, back, body, buttocks, and inner thighs showed a statistically significant decline with increasing stages of lipedema. The comparison of patient evaluation scores in the appearance domain demonstrated better patient self-perception scores in patients who received at least one session of the surgical treatment for the hips and thighs (p < 0.01), inner thighs (p < 0.01), and excess skin (0.01) scales. On the body scale, the patients who underwent liposuction again reported better satisfaction scores; however, this did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.081). In the health-related quality of life domain, the patients who received liposuction treatment reported a better outcome in the body image (p < 0.01), physical function (p = 0.05), physical symptoms (p = 0.04), and psychological function (p < 0.01) scales. Conclusions: The current study underscores the burden of lipedema of affected patients and its negative impact on self-perception. As the disease progresses, conservatively treated patients experience a decline in satisfaction with various aspects of their appearance. However, surgical interventions, particularly liposuction, does not address esthetic concerns but significantly improve health-related quality of life across multiple domains, emphasizing the comprehensive benefits of surgical intervention in the management of lipedema.

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Chronic edema in the lower extremities leads to significant negative effects on the quality of life, body image perception, satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-esteem of affected individuals. The aim of this study was to evaluate body image, quality of life, and related factors in patients with chronic lower extremity edema due to lymphedema and lipedema. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 14 lymphedema and 12 lipedema patients receiving treatment at the lymphedema unit. Individuals aged 18–65 years with a confirmed diagnosis were enrolled; those with active infections, malignancies, or systemic diseases were excluded. Body image, dysfunctional thoughts about appearance, and quality of life were evaluated using the Body Cathexis Scale, Beliefs About Appearance Scale, and Lymphedema Quality of Life scale. Circumference measurements of the lower extremities were taken before and after 20 sessions of manual lymphatic drainage therapy. Quantitative data were analyzed to compare the two groups and assess correlations between clinical and psychosocial parameters. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the lymphedema and lipedema groups in terms of age, body mass index, or pre-treatment Body Cathexis Scale, Beliefs About Appearance Scale, and Lymphedema Quality of Life scale scores (p>0.05). After 20 sessions of manual lymphatic drainage therapy, both groups showed reductions in limb circumference measurements (p<0.05). Reductions in limb size were moderately associated with improvements in Body Cathexis Scale and Lymphedema Quality of Life scale scores (p<0.05). Post-treatment improvements in body image and quality of life scores were observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that patients with lower extremity lymphedema and lipedema experience significant body image disturbances and reduced quality of life. Manual lymphatic drainage therapy improves limb circumference, body image, and quality of life.

DiVA portal is a finding tool for research publications and student theses written at the following 50 universities and research institutions.

<span><b>Background:</b> Lipedema is a subcutaneous adipose tissue disorder mainly affecting women. Its progressive nature often requires high-volume liposuction for efficient pain reduction. However, aspiration volumes of more than 5 L within a single session may lead to a variety of complications. Thus,</span> …

This study explored experienced weight stigma, internalised weight bias and depressive symptom severity in lipoedema, a chronic health condition that primarily affects women and involves painful and disproportionate adipose tissue. This study utilised an international cross-sectional online survey i …

Routine cold-water immersion (CWI) is typically suggested to reduce inflammation, a hallmark property of lipedema. Lipedema is a connective tissue disorder with a genetic component that presents with a disproportionate distribution of nodules in the extremities. This case report explores the impact …