Your search

IntroductionLipedema is a chronic and progressive adipose tissue disorder that predominantly affects women. However, despite its high prevalence and severe negative impact on quality of life, it remains significantly underdiagnosed. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge and awareness of …

Background/Objectives: Lipedema is a progressive disease that results in the bilateral and symmetrical accumulation of subcutaneous fat in the legs and/or arms, affecting almost exclusively women. Methods: A comprehensive review of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted between November 2024 and February 2025. Results: The pathophysiology of lipedema is complex and, especially in the early stages, shows similarities to obesity, involving adipocytes, adipose tissue-resident macrophages, and endothelial cells. In lipedema, systemic levels and the adipocyte expression of the classical adipokines adiponectin and leptin appear normal, while it remains unclear if markers of inflammation and oxidative stress are increased. Macrophages in the adipose tissue of patients have an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype and express high levels of the scavenger receptor CD163. These cells affect adipogenesis and seem to have a central role in adipose tissue accumulation. Increased lymphatic and blood vessel permeability are comorbidities of lipedema that occur in early disease states and may contribute to disease progression. Conclusions: This review summarizes our current understanding of the pathophysiology of lipedema with a focus on the role of stromal vascular localized M2 macrophages.

Lipedema is characterized by abnormal fat deposition in areas such as the arms, hips, buttocks, and thighs, sparing the hands and feet. Symptoms include pain, bruising, edema, and subcutaneous nodules, which resist traditional interventions such as diet and exercise. Despite increasing recognition, …

Lipoedema is a chronic and painful fat disorder that occurs almost exclusively in women. It mainly affects the legs and sometimes the arms. The condition not only causes physical complaints but also has a major impact on daily functioning and quality of life. Despite this, lipoedema is still poorly understood and appropriate care is often lacking. In this dissertation, we reviewed the existing literature on the functioning of people with lipoedema. In addition, we explored how they experience living with the condition, the challenges they face in managing it, and how healthcare professionals can provide better support. The studies show that lipoedema is more than meets the eye. Earlier research mainly focused on the physical aspects, while psychosocial issues such as shame, stigmatisation, and reduced social participation are equally important. Participants emphasised the need for personal guidance, access to specialised care, and reliable, evidence-based information. To address these needs, we developed a new self-management intervention: SELF-MANAGING your lipoedema. This programme helps people cope more effectively with their condition, take control of daily life, and set achievable goals together with their healthcare professionals. This dissertation highlights that good care for people with lipoedema must go beyond symptom management. A holistic approach is needed, alongside better knowledge and training for healthcare professionals, and policies that promote collaboration across disciplines. Such improvements can truly enhance the quality of life of those living with lipoedema.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects 537 million people as of 2021, and is projected to rise to 783 million by 2045. This positions DM as the ninth leading cause of death globally. Among DM patients, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality. Notably, the prevalence rate …

Abstract Background Lipedema is a chronic, incurable disorder characterized by painful fat accumulation in the extremities. While the application of liposuction in lipedema management has become increasingly popular, the safety and effectiveness of this approach remain contentious. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess various liposuction modalities in lipedema management to verify their safety and efficacy. Methods In-line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a comprehensive literature review from inception until March 2023 using the following electronic databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. Results From the 562 initially identified articles, 20 met our inclusion/exclusion criteria for evaluation. Our review encompassed 14 prospective cohort studies, 3 retrospective studies, 2 case series, and 1 cross-sectional study. A meta-analysis of nine articles revealed a notable improvement in the quality of life, pain, pressure sensitivity, bruising, cosmetic impairment, heaviness, walking difficulty, and itching among lipedema patients who underwent liposuction. Although complications such as inflammation, thrombosis, seroma, hematoma, and lymphedema-related skin changes were reported, severe complications were rare. Crucially, no instances of shock, recurrence, or mortality were reported. Conclusion Liposuction is a safe and beneficial therapeutic intervention for managing lipedema symptoms and enhancing quality of life. However, the impact of liposuction on secondary lymphedema remains unreported in the literature. Further high-quality, large-scale trials are necessary to assess the safety and effectiveness of different liposuction modalities. These studies will contribute valuable insights to optimize liposuction as a therapeutic option for individuals with lipedema. Level of Evidence I, risk/prognostic study.

Lipedema, a chronic and painful disorder primarily affecting women without a definitive cure, has traditionally been managed with conservative therapy, notably complete decongestive therapy, across many countries. Recently, liposuction has been explored as a potential surgical treatment, prompting this study to evaluate its effectiveness as possibly the first-line therapy for lipedema. Through extensive literature searches in databases such as CrossRef, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar up to December 2023, and using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment, the study selected seven studies for inclusion. Results showed significant post-operative improvements in spontaneous pain, edema, bruising, mobility, and quality of life among lipedema patients undergoing liposuction. However, over half of the patients still required conservative therapy after surgery. Despite these promising results, the study suggests caution due to lipedema's complexity, significant reliance on self-reported data, and limitations of the studies reviewed. Thus, while liposuction may offer symptomatic relief, it should be considered an adjunct, experimental therapy rather than a definitive cure, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to care.

Introdução: O lipedema, recentemente introduzido na 11ª revisão da Classificação Internacional de Doenças. Estima-se que metade das pessoas acometidas pelo lipedema, estejam em sobrepeso ou com obesidade, sendo uma associação de comorbidades que dificulta o diagnóstico. O diagnóstico errôneo é preocupante, pois atrasa o tratamento da doença permitindo a sua progressão. Objetivo: Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura (RIL) com objetivo de analisar o que se tem construído em pesquisas anteriores relacionadas ao lipedema. Metodologia: A busca dos artigos científicos foram os disponibilizados nos Periódicos da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). Os artigos constassem os Descritores em Ciências da Saúde (DeCS) com as palavras: lipedema and procedimento and cirurgia and mulher, e que fossem revisados por pares, nas línguas inglesa e portuguesa. a partir da aplicação dos critérios previamente definidos O período de busca foi realizado nos meses de maio a agosto de 2023. Resultados e Discussão: Foram elegíveis 12 artigos. A análise dos artigos encontrados possibilitou a evidente necessidade de conhecimento e clareza no diagnóstico do lipedema. As mulheres são as mais afetadas pela doença. A área afetada pode incluir os quadris, as pernas bilateral e simetricamente. E uma das principais características distintivas do lipedema é a preservação dos pés, o que pode criar um degrau distinto no tornozelo. Assim, a importância do diagnóstico diferencial. O procedimento cirúrgico como tratamento apresentou melhores resultados. Entretanto, a associação de todos os tratamentos sobressaiu na qualidade de melhora dos aspectos do lipedema. Conclusão: Essa revisão apontou para o complexo  diagnóstico do lipedema.  Esse assunto persiste como um desafio e deve instigar mais pesquisadores na busca para um diagnóstico preciso, opções de tratamento e até mesmo no sentido de prevenção para satisfazer a população assistida, no caso a maioria são as mulheres.  A melhor opção indicada pelos estudos analisados foi o tratamento cirúrgico realizado pela lipoaspiração.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema, a complex and enigmatic adipose tissue disorder, remains poorly understood despite its significant impact on the patients' quality of life. Genetic investigations have uncovered potential contributors to its pathogenesis, including somatic mutations, which are nonheritable genetic alterations that can play a pivotal role in the development of this disease. AIM: This review aims to elucidate the role of somatic mutations in the etiology of lipedema by examining their implications in adipose tissue biology, inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction. RESULTS: Studies focusing on leukocyte clones, genetic alterations like TET2 and DNMT3A, and the intricate interplay between adipose tissue and other organs have shed light on the underlying mechanisms driving lipedema. From the study of the scientific literature, mutations to genes correlated to three main pathways could be involved in the somatic development of lipedema: genes related to mitochondrial activity, genes related to localized disorders of subcutaneous adipose tissue, and genes of leukocyte clones. CONCLUSIONS: The insights gained from these diverse studies converge to highlight the complex genetic underpinnings of lipedema and offer potential avenues for therapeutic interventions targeting somatic mutations to alleviate the burden of this condition on affected individuals.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to provide an overview of the current evidence on the efficacy, also considering the anti-inflammatory properties and safety of very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) as a potential treatment for lipedema, particularly in the context of obesity. RECENT FINDINGS: Lipedema is a chronic disease characterized by abnormal and painful fat buildup on the legs and/or arms. It is often misdiagnosed as obesity or lymphedema. However, although lipedema and obesity can coexist, unlike obesity, lipedema usually affects the legs and thighs without affecting the feet or hands, and the abnormal deposition of adipose tissue in lipedema is painful. The current lifestyle interventions are often unsuccessful in the management of lipedema. There is no consensus on the most effective nutritional approach for managing lipedema. Recent studies have suggested that VLCKD may be an effective treatment for lipedema, demonstrating that it is also superior to other nutritional approaches such as Mediterranean diet or intermittent fasting. Lipedema is a chronic and debilitating disease characterized by abnormal and painful accumulation of adipose tissue in the legs. VLCKD has been shown to be an effective treatment for lipedema, especially in the context of obesity, due to its anti-inflammatory properties. However, further research is needed to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of VLCKD as a treatment for lipedema.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing lipedema remains a challenge due to its heterogeneous presentation, co-existing diseases, and the lack of objective diagnostic imaging. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to outline the currently available diagnostic imaging methods to characterize lipedema in the legs along with their diagnostic performance. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. The quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tool was used for quality assessment. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies describing a total of 1154 patients with lipedema were included for final analysis. Features for lipedema have been defined using ultrasound (increased subcutaneous adipose tissue), lymphoscintigraphy (slowing of the lymphatic flow and a frequent asymmetry between the lower extremities), computed tomography (symmetrical bilateral soft tissue enlargement without either skin thickening or subcutaneous edema), magnetic resonance imaging (increased subcutaneous adipose tissue), MR lymphangiography (enlarged lymphatic vessels up to a diameter of 2 mm), and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (fat mass in the legs adjusted for body mass index (BMI) ≥ 0.46 or fat mass in the legs adjusted for total fat mass ≥ 0.384). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of currently available imaging modalities for assessing lipedema is limited. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of each imaging modality. Imaging techniques focusing on the pathogenesis of the disease are needed.

Lymphedema and specifically cancer-related lymphedema is not the main focus for both patients and physicians dealing with cancer. Its etiology is an unfortunate complication of cancer treatment. Although lymphedema treatments have gained an appreciable consensus, many practitioners have developed and prefer their own specific protocols and this is especially true for conventional (manual) versus surgical treatments. This collection of presentations explores the incidence and genetics of cancer-related lymphedema, early detection and monitoring techniques, both conventional and operative treatment options, and the importance and role of exercise for patients with cancer-related lymphedema. These assembled presentations provide valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities presented by cancer-related lymphedema including the latest research, treatments, and exercises available to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Lipohyperplasia dolorosa (LiDo) is a genetic, painful fat tissue distribution disorder with lymphological high-volume transport insufficiency. It often has negative effects on the psychological well-being of affected female adolescents and adults. Similar in appearance to the development of obesity, the patients experience similar negative reactions in their families, partners and friends. The development of the LiDo usually occurs in adolescence or following pregnancy and represents a considerable psychological burden in central phases of narcissistic development. These psychological impairments caused by LiDo are long-term companions and influence interpersonal relationships. Three case vignettes serve for clarification. In the first case, the LiDo seems to be "grafted" onto a neurotic conflict, which intensifies the acute and chronic pain of the person affected. In the second case, the affected person shows defense mechanisms in contact, which are evidence of a high level of stress and require considerable sensitivity by the person's social circle during interactions. In the third case, after intensively addressing various aspects of the disease, the person received medical treatment from a specialist and underwent several surgeries. The positive effects on physical and psychological well-being are stabilized by psychological support. Seen as an option, those affected can decide for or against surgical treatment. As a consequence of the treatment, the previously rejected extremities become more integrated, arms and legs fit back into the person's own physical image of the body. This positive change also extends to the intrapsychic self-image of the body.

Background Lipedema is a loose connective tissue disease characterized by a disproportionate accumulation of adipose tissue in the limbs of women. Despite its incidence of 10-20%, lipedema is often underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed. Objectives This review aims to outline current available evidence regarding this enigmatic syndrome and gives a synopsis on the subjects that are still unknown. Materials and Methods PubMed and Embase searches were conducted to identify relevant articles on lipedema pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Results Lipedema can be considered a disease of the adipocytes or a circulatory disorder of the lymphatics. The relationship between lymphatics and adipose tissue remains controversial. The clinical distinction between lipedema, lymphedema, phlebolymphedema and lipolymphedema can be difficult. Diagnoses often coexist, further complicating the diagnosis of lipedema, which is currently made on clinical grounds alone. The value of diagnostic imaging studies is unclear. Liposuction appears to be an effective treatment and significantly improves symptoms. Conclusion Diagnosing lipedema remains a challenge due to its heterogeneous presentation, co-existing diseases, and the lack of objective diagnostic imaging. Further directions for research include the effect of excess skin resection surgery on lymphatic drainage.

A large and growing body of research suggests that the skin plays an important role in regulating total body sodium, challenging traditional models of sodium homeostasis that focused exclusively on blood pressure and the kidney. In addition, skin sodium may help to prevent water loss and facilitate macrophage-driven antimicrobial host defense, but may also trigger immune dysregulation via upregulation of pro-inflammatory markers and downregulation of anti-inflammatory processes. We performed a systematic search of PubMed for published literature on skin sodium and disease outcomes and found that skin sodium concentration is increased in patients with cardiometabolic conditions including hypertension, diabetes, and end-stage renal disease; autoimmune conditions including multiple sclerosis and systemic sclerosis; and dermatologic conditions including atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and lipedema. Several patient characteristics are associated with increased skin sodium concentration including older age and male sex. While animal evidence suggests that increased salt intake results in higher skin sodium levels, there are conflicting results from small trials in humans. Additionally, limited data suggest that pharmaceuticals such as diuretics and SGLT-2 inhibitors approved for diabetes, as well as hemodialysis may reduce skin sodium levels. In summary, emerging research supports an important role for skin sodium in physiologic processes related to osmoregulation and immunity. With the advent of new non-invasive MRI measurement techniques and continued research on skin sodium, it may emerge as a marker of immune-mediated disease activity or a potential therapeutic target.

Expert representatives from 11 professional societies, as part of an autonomous work group, researched and developed appropriate use criteria (AUC) for lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel lymph node mapping and lymphedema. The complete findings and discussions of the work group, including example clinical scenarios, were published on October 8, 2022, and are available at https://www.snmmi.org/ClinicalPractice/ content.aspx?ItemNumber=42021. The complete AUC document includes clinical scenarios for scintigraphy in patients with breast, cutaneous, and other cancers, as well as for mapping lymphatic flow in lymphedema. Pediatric considerations are addressed. These AUC are intended to assist health care practitioners considering lymphoscintigraphy. Presented here is a brief overview of the AUC, including the rationale and methodology behind development of the document. For detailed findings of the work group, the reader should refer to the complete AUC document online.

Lymphangiogenesis is the mechanism by which the lymphatic system develops and expands new vessels facilitating fluid drainage and immune cell trafficking. Models to study lymphangiogenesis are necessary for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and to identify or test new therapeutic agents that target lymphangiogenesis. Across the lymphatic literature, multiple models have been developed to study lymphangiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, lymphangiogenesis can be modeled with varying complexity, from monolayers to hydrogels to explants, with common metrics for characterizing proliferation, migration, and sprouting of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) and vessels. In comparison, in vivo models of lymphangiogenesis often use genetically modified zebrafish and mice, with in situ mouse models in the ear, cornea, hind leg, and tail. In vivo metrics, such as activation of LECs, number of new lymphatic vessels, and sprouting, mirror those most used in vitro, with the addition of lymphatic vessel hyperplasia and drainage. The impacts of lymphangiogenesis vary by context of tissue and pathology. Therapeutic targeting of lymphangiogenesis can have paradoxical effects depending on the pathology including lymphedema, cancer, organ transplant, and inflammation. In this review, we describe and compare lymphangiogenic outcomes and metrics between in vitro and in vivo studies, specifically reviewing only those publications in which both testing formats are used. We find that in vitro studies correlate well with in vivo in wound healing and development, but not in the reproductive tract or the complex tumor microenvironment. Considerations for improving in vitro models are to increase complexity with perfusable microfluidic devices, co-cultures with tissue-specific support cells, the inclusion of fluid flow, and pairing in vitro models of differing complexities. We believe that these changes would strengthen the correlation between in vitro and in vivo outcomes, giving more insight into lymphangiogenesis in healthy and pathological states.

Liposuction plays an important role as a surgical treatment option for lipoedema. This document serves to critically review the evidence in the literature, as well as explain the differences between the lipoedema population compared to the aesthetic surgery population undergoing liposuction. It is not a comprehensive text on lipoedema management but serves to guide surgeons. This guidance was produced on behalf of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS) and British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) by the expert liposuction group. The guidance is based on evidence available in the literature along with specialist expert opinion on liposuction for lipoedema to provide plastic surgeons with consensus recommendation for surgical treatment. The aim is to identify best practice to maximise the safety of patients. This article summarises current practises and safety considerations and outlines recommendations covering various aspects of patient care.

The disease "Lipedema", which has been known since 1940, is increasingly better understood. Dimpled edema in particular is not significant in women with fat distribution disorders on the arms and legs. These and other scientific findings are "work in progress" with the aim of renaming the disease. A "proper name" is "Lipohyperplasia dolorosa" (LiDo). With LiDo, the increase in volume is genetically fixed, but the pain is dynamically progressive. A LiDo must be distinguished from other symmetrical, painless fat distribution disorders on the arms and legs at first sight and after palpatory examination, especially from the occasionally coincident obesity. Obesity is never comorbid, but often coincident with LiDo. Although physical activity and a change in diet can reduce obesity, they cannot eliminate the disproportionate increase in fat tissue on the extremities that is exclusively caused by LiDo. In LiDo patients coincident with obesity, gastric surgery has no effect on the obligatory pain. There are both conservative and surgical treatment options for LiDo. A procedure that has been established since 1997 is surgical treatment using lymphological liposculpture. As part of this operation, large wounds are created under the skin, which, according to the "Rules of Nine" when treating both arms in one session and the suction of the legs in 2 sessions per operation, correspond to an area of ​​18% of the body surface. However, with adequate postoperative management and the administration of antibiotics and antithrombotics, local complications associated with the operation are rare. The most important result of consistent surgical treatment of lipohyperplasia dolorosa is the impact on quality of life: "It ruined her life" becomes "It improves her life".