Your search

he term “lipedema“ was first used in 1974 by ALLEN and HINES. Their publication is regarded as “the classical description“ of the syndrome5; p. 184: “We wish to describe a clinical syndrome, lipedema of the legs, which is frequently very distressing. In our experience it affects solely women. The chief complaint is of swelling of the legs and feet...On questioning, the physician may elicit that enlargement of the limbs has always been generalized and symmetrical. The swelling below the knees is accentuated when patients are on their feet much and in warm weather. Aching distress in the legs is common... Occasionally, a patient feels, that her large legs have ‘ruined her life.’ Many are ‘ashamed’ of their legs.” This describes the patient’s problems very well, but it is difficult to define lipedema precisely because the definition depends mainly on subjective findings. There are no medical or laboratory tests to distinguish local lipohypertrophy (local fat tissue increase) of the legs or hips from lipedema or general obesity. Consequently, lipedema is not generally accepted as a real disease. We will attempt to describe the current knowledge on the pathophysiology and treatment of lipedema. Lipedema is a metabolic disorder of the adipose (fat) tissue with unknown etiology, affecting almost exclusively females. The following clinical and pathophysiological findings are of importance for differential diagnosis.

This case presentation illustrates the tremendous functional gains that individuals with lipo-lymphedema can achieve with proper diagnosis, education and treatment.

After successful completion of a conservative initial treatment consisting of manual lymph drainage and bandaging a lipedema must be fitted with an adequate compression garment made of flat-knitted material.The type of the compression supply and its duration following liposuction depends on the result obtained after the removal of fatty tissue. Due to liposuction alone, an improvement of the quality of life can be already achieved. An additional treatment using compression garments may have a positive effect, too.

Only a limited number of studies on cellulite have been published in the international literature and many of them reach somewhat antithetical conclusions. Consequently, it is not yet possible to reconcile the extreme differences of opinion which have lingered on for years concerning the nature of this disorder, as well as its origin and even the most basic aspects of its histopathological classification. It does not even have a recognized name: in fact, the term 'cellulitis' is used in scientific English to indicate a spreading gangrenous infection of the subcutaneous cellular tissue. The other terms used from time to time [panniculitis, lipodystrophy, edematofibrosclerotic panniculitis (EFP), liposclerosis, lipoedema, etc.] have quite different morphological and pathogenetic connotations in general. Over the last few decades, three major conflicting theories have emerged in relation to the ethiopathogenesis of cellulite. These indicate, respectively, the following causes: 1. Oedema caused by excessive hydrophilia of the intercellular matrix. 2. A homeostatic alteration on a regional microcirculatory level; this pathogenetic theory is summarized in a synthetic and self-explanatory denomination: EFP. 3. A peculiar anatomical conformation of the subcutaneous tissue of women, different from male morphology. These theories must all now be updated in the light of recent advances on the sophisticated and composite physiopathology of the adipose organ - which acts not only as a control device which regulates the systematic equilibrium of energy and modulates the food intake and the metabolism of other tissue substrate through a multiple glandular secretion of hormones and parahormones.

OBJECTIVE: Many investigations and treatments exist for lower limb lymphoedema. We undertook a survey on the management of this condition by vascular surgeons and the resources available for its treatment in the UK. DESIGN: A questionnaire was designed to assess the management of lymphoedema. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent to all members of the The Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland. RESULTS: 251/440 (57%) consultant surgeons returned a completed questionnaire comprising 45.3% teaching hospital and 54.7% district general hospital (DGH) consultants. 77.9% of the consultants saw less than 10 patients annually with lymphoedema. The commonest causes of lymphoedema were primary lymphoedema (99.3%) and malignancy (37.1%). Lipoedema, a cause of limb swelling was only seen or recognised by 46.2% of the consultants. The commonest investigations performed were a duplex scan, lymphoscintigram, full blood count and urea and electrolytes. The common methods of confirming lymphoedema were either by lymphoscintigram (54.5%) or from a diagnosis of exclusion (33.7%). Lymphoedema physiotherapy was available only to 53.8% of the consultants. Surgery was performed by 10.5% of consultants. 73.4% of the consultants believed that lymphoedema is managed inadequately and 72.9% believed that resources are insufficient in the UK for this condition. CONCLUSION: In the UK the majority of vascular consultants see less than 10 patients annually with lymphoedema. Very few patients undergo confirmation of this diagnosis with non-invasive investigation and very few consultants perform surgery. Management of this condition is perceived by the consultants to be poor, with a lack of resources and particular shortage of lymphoedema physiotherapists. Centralisation of these services may be a way of improving this condition.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a rare and painful disease in women. Until recently, it could be treated only by conservative methods (combined physical therapy). OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of surgery (liposuction) concerning appearance and associated complaints. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients, who had undergone conservative therapy over a period of years, were treated by liposuction under tumescent local anesthesia with vibrating microcannulas. Twenty-one could be reevaluated after an average of 12.2 (1-26) months. RESULTS: All showed great improvement, with normalization of body proportions. Additionally, spontaneous pain, sensitivity to pressure, and bruising either disappeared completely or improved markedly. Other than minor swelling for a few days, no complications could be observed following surgery. All patients reported a tremendous increase in their quality of life. Physical therapy had to be continued to a much lower degree. CONCLUSION: Tumescent liposuction has proved to be a safe and effective treatment for lipedema.

Combined decongestive therapy (CDT) in lipedema can only reduce edema, not the fat components; therefore only a portion of the symptoms can be treated. In contrast liposuction is able to reduce the increased volume of fatty tissue; it also decreases the tendency to develop edema. Only by combining conservative and surgical therapy regimens optimal results can be achieved. From the theoretical and practical point of view nowadays in lipedema grade I, II and partially grade III conservative treatment alone can be considered as an insufficient therapy.

Lipoedema is a form of lipodistrophy, which consists of abnormal accumulation of fat in subcutaneous tissue of the lower limbs. It does not cause any disease and it has not been reported association with malignity. We describe a 63-year-old woman occurring of Kaposi sarcoma on the lipoedema base.

Purpose: Assessment of the relation between age and lymph transport in lipedema patients using lymphoscintigraphic function test. Material and methods: 99mTc human serum nanocolloid (37 MBq) was injected subcutaneously into the dorsum of foot (n = 290 feet) in female patients suffering of lipedema, lipolipedema or patients with normal lymph transport. Patients were enrolled in standardized exercise tasks. For the radioisotope uptake calculation regional lymph nodes depth was determined by SPECT (single photon computed tomography). Results: The lymph node uptake of young patients (until 35 years) reaches higher values than the normal collective and decreases significantly with age until it drop's below the normal collective. Conclusions: The lymphoscintigraphic function test of the legs showed an increased transport function of the epifascial lymphatic system by younger and a decreased transport function by elder patients with lipedema compared to the normal population, the high transport values suggest a high lymphatic volume with compensatory capacity increase of the lymphatic system in young patients. According to these results of the lymphatic transport function the age of the patients has to be regarded.

The primary lymphedema is a pathological interstitial accumulation of lymphatic fluid. Lower limbs are mainly affected by primary lymphedema. It is caused by a hereditary lack or complete absence of lymphatic vessel systeme. Final complications of chronic limb lymphedema include »elephantiasis«, lymphatic ulceration and malignant degeneration. Secondary lymphedema, obesity, phlebedema and lipedema are most important differential diagnoses.Treatment of primary lymphedema includes early manual lymph drainages, decrease in weight, exercise, prevention or therapy of skin infections. Up to the present primary lymhedema cannot be cured in causality.