Your search

Lipedema is a chronic, progressive disease marked by abnormal fat distribution in the limbs, resulting in disproportionately sized and painful limbs. It primarily affects women and causes significant disability, functional impairment, and psychological distress. Despite its clinical significance in women’s health, lipedema is largely unknown, underdiagnosed, and misdiagnosed with other diseases with similar symptoms including obesity. It is difficult to distinguish between obesity and lipedema since these two conditions often coexist. Since the precise etiology of lipedema is yet to be determined, there is no treatment that targets the underlying cause. The most basic conservative treatment is decongestive physical therapy, which is normally needed life-long. In some cases, surgical procedures such as liposuction and excisional lipectomy are the therapeutic alternatives. Lipedematous scalp is a rare, dermatological condition with no known cause, characterized by increased subcutaneous tissue thickness and a smooth and boggy scalp. When it occurs in conjunction with alopecia, it is known as lipedematous alopecia, often mistaken as androgenetic alopecia. The goals of this article are to explain the etiology, clinical features, and treatment options for lipedema and lipedematous scalp (two relatively less known conditions), as well as to highlight their diagnostic features.

Introduction Lipoedema is a chronic and progressive fat distribution disorder characterised by a symmetrical disproportional increase of adipose tissue on the extremities. The disorder is most commonly associated with pain, oedemas, increased tendency of bruising, as well as sensory dysfunctions on the affected limbs, resulting in severely reduced quality of life (QoL) for exclusively female patients. According to current clinical guidelines, conservative treatment of lipoedema consists of manual lymphatic drainage, compression garments, or both combined as complex decongestive therapy (CDT). If conservative therapy does not result in sufficient improvement of symptoms, a surgical intervention, in the form of liposuction under tumescence anaesthesia, may be indicated. This systematic review aims to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of liposuction in patients with lipoedema (stage I-III) in comparison to any conservative treatment, concerning patient-relevant outcomes, as reduction of pain, reduction in the size of extremities, improvement of QoL, and procedure-related adverse events. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in December 2020 in five databases to answer customised research questions on clinical effectiveness and safety-related outcomes, yielding in overall 294 potentially relevant hits. One additional hit was identified by hand search. The study selection, data extraction, and assessment of the methodological quality of the studies were performed by two independent researchers. Results A total of six prospective and one retrospective single-arm before/after studies were eligible for inclusion in the current report. Overall, data on safety and clinical effectiveness were evaluated in 492 and 467 female patients of all three lipoedema stages, respectively. The post-operative follow-up ranged from six months to twelve years. Clinical effectiveness Due to the lack of controlled trials, no conclusions on the comparative clinical effectiveness of liposuction for lipoedema could be made. Therefore, data from the prospective single-arm studies comparing patient-reported complaints before and after the liposuction were analysed. All six prospective studies reported statistically significant improvements in pain outcomes pre- vs post-liposuction. These effects were reported beginning at a six-month follow-up but also up to twelve years after the intervention. Reduced sizes of patients’ extremities before-and-after liposuction were reported in three of the included studies, in terms of reduced leg volume and circumference of lower extremities. Statistically significant changes in lipoedema-related QoL outcomes were reported by four studies. Further, reduction in complaints about oedema/swelling, bruising and sensory dysfunctions were reported in some of the included studies.

Williams syndrome (WS) is a relatively rare microdeletion disorder that occurs in as many as 1:7,500 individuals. WS arises due to the mispairing of low-copy DNA repetitive elements at meiosis. The deletion size is similar across most individuals with WS and leads to the loss of one copy of 25–27 genes on chromosome 7q11.23. The resulting unique disorder affects multiple systems, with cardinal features including but not limited to cardiovascular disease (characteristically stenosis of the great arteries and most notably supravalvar aortic stenosis), a distinctive craniofacial appearance, and a specific cognitive and behavioural profile that includes intellectual disability and hypersociability. Genotype–phenotype evidence is strongest for ELN, the gene encoding elastin, which is responsible for the vascular and connective tissue features of WS, and for the transcription factor genes GTF2I and GTF2IRD1, which are known to affect intellectual ability, social functioning and anxiety. Mounting evidence also ascribes phenotypic consequences to the deletion of BAZ1B, LIMK1, STX1A and MLXIPL, but more work is needed to understand the mechanism by which these deletions contribute to clinical outcomes. The age of diagnosis has fallen in regions of the world where technological advances, such as chromosomal microarray, enable clinicians to make the diagnosis of WS without formally suspecting it, allowing earlier intervention by medical and developmental specialists. Phenotypic variability is considerable for all cardinal features of WS but the specific sources of this variability remain unknown. Further investigation to identify the factors responsible for these differences may lead to mechanism-based rather than symptom-based therapies and should therefore be a high research priority.

The Western diet is rich in salt, and a high salt diet (HSD) is suspected to be a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. It is now widely accepted that an experimental HSD can stimulate components of the immune system, potentially exacerbating certain autoimmune diseases, or alternatively, improving defenses against certain infections, such as cutaneous leishmaniasis. However, recent findings show that an experimental HSD may also aggravate other infections (e.g., pyelonephritis or systemic listeriosis). Here, we discuss the modulatory effects of a HSD on the microbiota, metabolic signaling, hormonal responses, local sodium concentrations, and their effects on various immune cell types in different tissues. We describe how these factors are integrated, resulting either in immune stimulation or suppression in various tissues and disease settings.

FULL TEXT PDF

Lipedema is a chronic feminine disease that causes abnormal fat deposition in lower limbs and occasionally upper limbs. Easy bruising and pain are common. Lipedema patients suffer from both physical and psychological disability. Despite the relatively high prevalence and the impact on the quality of life, little is known about the disease. The majority of patients are misdiagnosed as lymphedema or obesity. The objective was to perform a non-systematic review on lipedema literature, related to diagnosis and therapy. Regarding pathophysiology, alterations are not exclusively confined to adipose tissue. Lymphatic dysfunction, cardiovascular variations, blood capillary fragility and increased permeability are common. Patients often present with neurological alterations and hormonal malfunction. Elevated cutaneous sodium has been documented. Due to the absence of a defined etiology, evidence-based research is difficult in the management of lipedema. The setting of realistic expectations is important for both patient and medical care provider. The major aims of the management are multimodal for improvements in the quality of life; reduction in heaviness and pain, reshaping the affected limbs, weight control, improvements in mobility. Compression garments, physical therapy, exercise regimens, diet and psychological counseling are necessities. For selected patients, surgical treatment is an added option.

BACKGROUND: When performing large volume liposuction, perioperative management of lipedema patients with coagulation disorders remains challenging due to a lack of clinical experience. With a prevalence of 1% of von Willebrand disease (VWD) in the general population, basic knowledge on diagnostic and adapted surgical strategies are essential for patients' safety. OBJECTIVE: Based on a selective literature review, the purpose of this article is to present a standardized algorithm for diagnosis and perioperative treatment of VWD patients undergoing large volume liposuction. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Web of Science were selectively searched with the term "(((liposuction) OR (surgery)) OR (lipectomy)) AND (((VWD) OR (hemostaseology)) OR (von Willebrand disease))". Included were articles published in English or German until November 2020. RESULTS: The evidence for large volume liposuctions in patients with VWD is limited. Experience is largely based on operations with similar bleeding risks. A safe performance requires an adjustment of the surgical technique and a customized perioperative drug substitution plan. According to the current literature, perioperative thromboembolic events appear to be rare with adequate drug treatment. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the developed diagnostic and treatment algorithm may help further reducing bleeding complications and improve the safety for treated patients.

Lipedema is an infrequently recognized disorder. It is characterized by bilateral painful enlargement of the legs due to abnormal depositions of subcutaneous fat, that can result in considerable disability. The diagnosis is established on the basis of medical history and clinical findings. Early diagnosis of this disorder is necessary to start adapted management and prevent progression and complications of the disease. Currently there is no curative treatment. The conservative treatment requires a multidimensional approach including manual lymph drainage, compression garments and management or prevention of obesity as well as other comorbidities. In some cases, surgery may be considered.

Introduction: Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), one of the components of complex decongestive physiotherapy, which is accepted as the gold standard in the treatment of lymphedema, is used for therapeutic purposes in many diseases. The most well-known feature of MLD is that it helps to reduce edema. In addition to reducing edema, MLD has many effects, such as increasing venous flow, reducing fatigue, and raising the pain threshold. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study examining the effects of MLD other than its effects on edema in detail. The aim of this study is to compile effects of MLD and to provide a better understanding of the effects of MLD.Methods: A literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library in July 2019, to identify different effects of MLD. The articles were chosen by, first, reading the abstract and subsequently data were analyzed by reading the entire text through full-text resources. To undertake the study, we have collected information published about different effects of MLD over the last 30 years (1989–2019). According to our results, 20 studies met inclusion criteria.Conclusions: This study suggests that MLD can be used in symptomatic treatment of various diseases (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease) considering the effects of MLD on the systems.

In contrast to obesity, which is very frequent, lipomatosis and lipodystrophy syndromes are rare diseases of adipose tissue. Lipodystrophy syndromes are characterized by metabolic abnormalities associated with partial or generalized lipoatrophy. Lipomatosis is defined by the presence of several body lipomas without lipoatrophy. Dercum’s disease (DD) and Roch-Leri mesosomatous lipomatosis (RLML) are rare and poorly characterized forms of lipomatosis. They have raised little clinical interest despite the non-negligible consequences of DD on quality of life. The main clinical presentation of these diseases includes multiple lipomas, which are painful in DD (in contrast to RLML). The two diseases are frequently associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome, with hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia. The long-term course of the diseases remains poorly described. DD affects mainly women, whereas RLML mostly affects men. In both diseases lipomas are found on the back and thighs, as well as on the abdomen in DD and the forearms in RLML. The painful lipomas tend to recur after surgery in DD (in contrast to RLML). Most cases are sporadic. No specific treatment has been identified, as the pathophysiology remains unknown. Nevertheless, low-grade fat inflammation and specific abnormalities such as hyperbasophilia deserve further investigation. The aim of this review is to analyze the available literature on the topic.

Lipedema is an underdiagnosed painful adipose tissue disorder that occurs almost exclusively in women, with onset manifesting at puberty or at times of hormonal change. Unlike many fat disorders, diet and exercise have little to no impact on the prevention or progression of this disease. Estrogens control the distribution of body fat and food intake, regulate leptin expression, increase insulin sensitivity, and reduce inflammation through signaling pathways mediated by its receptors, estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and ERβ. This review will focus on understanding the role of estrogen in the pathogenesis of the disease and envisage potential hormonal therapy for lipedema patients.

Lipoedema is a chronic disease frequent in women, that causes an abnormal fat deposition in their lower limbs, with a remarkable disproportion between the upper and lower part of the body, easy bruising and pain. Despite the lack of pathognomonic tests for lipoedema, more and more patients in social networks are claiming they suffer from it, giving the disease more visibility but allowing a lot of fake information about lipoedema. Information for self-care and realistic expectations are important. Depending on the severity, the treatment includes: physical therapies, compression garments, exercise, diet, psychological support and surgical treatment.

It has now been *20 years since the original Lymphatic Continuum conference was convened, and this continuum has transitioned from a compelling concept to a reality. The explosive growth in our comprehension of lymphatic genetics, development, and function has expanded and modified our traditional views regarding what is, and is not, lymphatic disease. Groundbreaking investigations over the past decade have now defined a large and growing list of pathological conditions in which morphological or function lymphatic alterations can be identified. This list includes atherosclerosis and dyslipidemia, hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases, inflammation and inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, narrow angle glaucoma, and, most recently and compellingly, neurodegenerative disease. The sometimes overlapping but largely disparate nature of these various aforementioned disease categories suggests that the presence, or absence, of structural or functional lymphatic derangements may represent a previously unrecognized unifying influence in the maintenance of health and the promotion of disease. Future investigation of lymphatic mechanisms in disease will likely continue to elucidate the influences of lymphatic dysfunction, perhaps subtle, that can invest other, seemingly unrelated, diseases. In future, such discoveries will provide mechanistic insights and may potentiate the development of a new lymphatic-based approach to human disease diagnosis and therapeutics.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Williams syndrome is a multisystem disorder caused by a microdeletion on chromosome 7q. Throughout infancy, childhood, and adulthood, abnormalities in body composition and in multiple endocrine axes may arise for individuals with Williams syndrome. This review describes the current literature regarding growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome with recommendations for surveillance and management by the endocrinologist, geneticist, or primary care physician. RECENT FINDINGS: In addition to known abnormalities in stature, calcium metabolism, and thyroid function, individuals with Williams syndrome are increasingly recognized to have low bone mineral density, increased body fat, and decreased muscle mass. Furthermore, recent literature identifies a high prevalence of diabetes and obesity starting in adolescence, and, less commonly, a lipedema phenotype in both male and female individuals. Understanding of the mechanisms by which haploinsufficiency of genes in the Williams syndrome-deleted region contributes to the multisystem phenotype of Williams syndrome continues to evolve. SUMMARY: Multiple abnormalities in growth, body composition, and endocrine axes may manifest in individuals with Williams syndrome. Individuals with Williams syndrome should have routine surveillance for these issues in either the primary care setting or by an endocrinologist or geneticist.

Many drugs are responsible, through different mechanisms, for peripheral edema. Severity is highly variable ranging from slight edema of the lower limbs to anasarca pictures as in the capillary leak syndrome. Although most often non-inflammatory and bilateral, some drugs are associated with peripheral edema that is readily erythematous (e.g., pemetrexed) or unilateral (e.g., sirolimus). Thus, drug-induced peripheral edema is underrecognized and misdiagnosed, frequently leading to a prescribing cascade. Four main mechanisms are involved, namely precapillary arteriolar vasodilation (vasodilatory edema), sodium/water retention (renal edema), lymphatic insufficiency (lymphedema) and increased capillary permeability (permeability edema). The underlying mechanism has significant impact on treatment efficacy. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the main causative drugs by illustrating each pathophysiological mechanism and their management through an example of drug.

Significance: Primary lymphedema is a chronic condition without a cure. The lower extremities are more commonly affected than the arms or genitalia. The disease can be syndromic. Morbidity includes decreased self-esteem, infections, and reduced function of the area. Recent Advances: Several mutations can cause lymphedema, and new variants continue to be elucidated. A critical determinant that predicts the natural history and morbidity of lymphedema is the patient's body mass index (BMI). Individuals who maintain an active lifestyle with a normal BMI generally have less severe disease compared to subjects who are obese. Because other causes of lower extremity enlargement can be confused with lymphedema, definitive diagnosis requires lymphoscintigraphy. Critical Issues: Most patients with primary lymphedema are satisfactorily managed with compression regimens, exercise, and maintenance of a normal body weight. Suction-assisted lipectomy is our preferred operative intervention for symptomatic patients who have failed conservative therapy. Suction-assisted lipectomy effectively removes excess subcutaneous fibro-adipose tissue and can improve underlying lymphatic function. Future Directions: Many patients with primary lymphedema do not have an identifiable mutation and thus novel variants will be identified. The mechanisms by which mutations cause lymphedema continue to be studied. In the future, drug therapy for the disease may be developed.