Your search

Summary: Lipedema is a chronic disease characterized by the disproportionate and symptomatic accumulation of fat in the lower limbs and arms. Women with lipedema experience heaviness, fatigue and p...

Objectives This double-blind, randomized clinical trial sought to demonstrate the effectiveness of Pycnogenol® in the symptomatic control and body composition management of patients with lipedema. Methods This was a double-blind, randomized clinical trial with 60 days of follow-up involving one hundred patients. The study utilized a quality-of-life questionnaire (QuASiL), bioimpedance analysis, and clinical monitoring. Results Of the one hundred patients initially included, seven were lost to follow-up; however, monotonic multiple imputation was applied for data analysis. The two groups were similar in all aspects except for initial weight. The placebo group showed an increase in mean QuASiL scores after 30 and 60 days from the first assessment, representing a worsening of symptoms over time. In contrast, the intervention group demonstrated a progressive and significant reduction in scores, with means of 69.5 ± 28 at 30 days and 63.2 ± 27 at 60 days (p < 0.001). This group also showed a statistically significant reduction in weight, BMI, and body fat percentage. Conclusions Pycnogenol® appears to be a promising therapeutic option to support the clinical management of lipedema, a condition that exerts numerous negative physical and emotional impacts throughout the lives of affected patients.

Lipedema is a chronic disorder characterized by the symmetrical accumulation of subcutaneous adipose tissue, predominantly affecting women. Despite increasing recognition, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying adipose tissue dysfunction in lipedema remain incompletely understood. This mini review combines current knowledge about adipose tissue biology in lipedema, highlighting recent discoveries, ongoing controversies, and future research directions. A comprehensive literature review was conducted focusing on adipose tissue-related research in lipedema with emphasis on pathophysiological mechanisms, cellular composition, and therapeutic implications. Recent studies reveal that lipedema adipose tissue exhibits distinct characteristics, including M2 macrophage predominance, stage-dependent adipocyte hypertrophy, progressive fibrosis, and altered lymphatic/vascular function. The inflammatory profile differs markedly from obesity, with an anti-inflammatory M2-like macrophage phenotype rather than the pro-inflammatory M1 response seen in classic obesity. Emerging evidence suggests lipedema may represent a model of “healthy” subcutaneous adipose tissue expansion with preserved metabolic function despite increased adiposity. Current research proposes menopause as a critical turning point, driven by estrogen receptor imbalance and intracrine estrogen excess. Lipedema represents a unique adipose tissue disorder distinct from obesity, characterized by specific cellular and molecular signatures. Current research gaps include the need for validated biomarkers, standardized diagnostic criteria, and targeted therapeutics. Future research should focus on elucidating the molecular mechanisms driving adipose tissue dysfunction and developing precision medicine approaches.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by abnormal fat accumulation, pain, often necessitating surgical intervention. While liposuction is the primary treatment to remove pathological fat, postoperative skin laxity poses a significant challenge, particularly in advanced stages. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the efficacy of helium plasma technology as an adjunct to liposuction of the lower limbs across the three clinical stages of lipedema, with a focus on its impact on skin tone, elasticity, and the necessity for dermolipectomy. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 90 female patients with lower limbs lipedema, divided equally across Stages I, II, and III. Helium plasma technology was applied post-liposuction to enhance skin tightening. Outcomes included postoperative skin elasticity, dermolipectomy incidence, and patient satisfaction RESULTS: In Stage I, skin tone and elasticity increased by 25%, though the already low need for dermolipectomy remained largely unchanged. In Stage II, skin elasticity improved by 40%, reducing the incidence of dermolipectomy from 30 to 10%. In Stage III, while the need for dermolipectomy was unaffected, helium plasma contributed to improved skin elasticity and patient satisfaction. No major adverse events were reported. This study is limited by the absence of a randomized control group and the lack of blinding in outcome assessments, which may introduce observer bias. These factors should be considered when interpreting the results and highlight the need for future controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: Helium plasma technology offers stage-specific benefits in liposuction for lipedema of the lower limbs. It enhances skin tone and elasticity in early stages, reduces dermolipectomy requirements in intermediate stages, and improves skin quality in advanced stages when combined with dermolipectomy. Further research is needed to validate these findings and optimize protocols for clinical use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

This article aims to summarize contemporary understanding and management strategies of lipedema. It will elucidate recent advancements in diagnostic methodologies, the role of imaging technologies, and evolving therapeutic interventions. The article will further delineate critical areas that warrant further investigation.

Introduction: Lipedema is a chronic, progressive loose–connective-tissue disorder characterized by painful, disproportionate subcutaneous adipose tissue, functional limitations, and impaired quality of life, prompting growing interest in evidence-based management strategies. Objective: To systematically review contemporary human studies on surgical and non-surgical treatments for lipedema, with emphasis on symptom control, functional outcomes, complications, and quality of life, and to synthesize comparative effectiveness across modalities. Methods: We planned a PRISMA-compliant search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP for the last five years, expanding to ten years only if fewer than ten eligible studies were found; inclusion criteria prioritized human clinical trials and observational studies, with basic science excluded from synthesis; risk of bias and certainty of evidence (GRADE) were prespecified; data were extracted for populations, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and follow-up. Results and Discussion: Recent literature suggests that compression therapy, exercise, and pneumatic compression can reduce pain and edema and improve patient-reported outcomes, while liposuction techniques including tumescent, power-assisted, and water-assisted approaches generally show substantial improvements in symptoms and health-related quality of life with acceptable complication rates; however, heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria, outcome measures, and follow-up limits certainty of pooled estimates. Conclusion: Contemporary evidence supports a stepped, individualized approach beginning with optimized conservative care and progressing to lipedema reduction surgery in appropriately selected patients, with shared decision-making and standardized outcome measurement essential for practice and future research. &nbsp;

Lipedema is a painful disease of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in women. This study determined whether an advanced pneumatic compression device (APCD) improved lipedema SAT depth, swelling, and pain. Women with lipedema started 20–30 mm Hg compression leggings then were randomized to an APCD (Lympha Press Optimal Plus) group for 30 days (treatment; n = 22) or a no APCD (Control; n = 24) group. APCD treatment significantly reduced left leg volume (3D imaging, LymphaTech; p < 0.043) and fluid in the left (p = 0.0018) and right legs (p = 0.0476; SOZO, bioimpedance spectroscopy); controls showed no change. Treatment significantly decreased extracellular fluid (ECF) and intracellular fluid (ICF) in left (p = 0.0077; p = 0.0060) and right legs (p = 0.0476; p ≤ 0.025), respectively. Only ECF decreased significantly in the left (p < 0.0183) and right legs (p = 0.0009) in controls. SAT depth decreased significantly by ultrasound after treatment at the anterior (p ≤ 0.0234) and medial thigh (p ≤ 0.0052), medial knee (p ≤ 0.0002) and posterior calf (p ≤ 0.0118) but not in controls. All signs and symptoms of lipedema improved in the treatment group including swelling (p = 0.0005) and tenderness (pain) of right (p = 0.0003) and left legs (p < 0.0001); only swelling improved in controls (p = 0.0377). In total, 87.5% of RAND SF-36 quality of life improved after treatment (p ≤ 0.0351) compared to 37.5% in controls (p ≤ 0.0475). APCDs are effective treatment for lipedema.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) compared with a control diet on pain in female patients with lipedema. The secondary objectives were to compare the impact of the two diets on quality of life (QoL) and investigate potential associations of changes in pain with changes in body weight, body composition, and ketosis. METHODS: Adult female patients with lipedema and obesity were randomized to either the LCD or control diet (energy prescription: 1200 kcal/day) for 8 weeks. Body weight and body composition, pain (Brief Pain Inventory measured pain), and QoL (RAND 36-Item Health Survey [RAND-36], Impact of Weight on Quality of Life [IWQOL]-Lite, and Lymphoedema Quality of Life [LYMQOL]) were measured at baseline and at postintervention. RESULTS: A total of 70 female patients (age, mean [SD], 47 [11] years; BMI 37 [5] kg/m2) were included. The LCD group had greater weight loss (-2.8 kg; 95% CI: -4.1 to -1.0; p < 0.001) and larger reduction in pain now (-1.1; 95% CI: -1.9 to -0.3; p = 0.009) compared with the control group. No association was found between changes in pain now and weight loss. Both groups experienced improvements in several QoL dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Diet-induced weight loss in women with lipedema can improve QoL. An energy-restricted LCD seems to be superior to a standard control diet in reducing pain.

Lipedema, a chronic and painful disorder primarily affecting women without a definitive cure, has traditionally been managed with conservative therapy, notably complete decongestive therapy, across many countries. Recently, liposuction has been explored as a potential surgical treatment, prompting this study to evaluate its effectiveness as possibly the first-line therapy for lipedema. Through extensive literature searches in databases such as CrossRef, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar up to December 2023, and using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment, the study selected seven studies for inclusion. Results showed significant post-operative improvements in spontaneous pain, edema, bruising, mobility, and quality of life among lipedema patients undergoing liposuction. However, over half of the patients still required conservative therapy after surgery. Despite these promising results, the study suggests caution due to lipedema's complexity, significant reliance on self-reported data, and limitations of the studies reviewed. Thus, while liposuction may offer symptomatic relief, it should be considered an adjunct, experimental therapy rather than a definitive cure, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to care.

Obesity prevalence is rising globally, as are the number of chronic disorders connected with obesity, such as diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Bariatric surgery is also becoming more common, and it remains the most effective and long-term treatment for obesity. This study will assess the influence of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) on gut microbiota in people with obesity before and after surgery. The findings shed new light on the changes in gut microbiota in Saudi people with obesity following LSG. In conclusion, LSG may improve the metabolic profile, resulting in decreased fat mass and increased lean mass, as well as improving the microbial composition balance in the gastrointestinal tract, but this is still not equivalent to normal weight microbiology. A range of factors, including patient characteristics, geographic dispersion, type of operation, technique, and nutritional and caloric restriction, could explain differences in abundance between studies. This information could point to a novel and, most likely, tailored strategy in obesity therapy, which could eventually be incorporated into health evaluations and monitoring in preventive health care or clinical medicine.

The aim was to analyze the effect of compression tights on skin temperature in women with lipedema and to assess the effect of different knitting on skin temperature. Twenty-four women with lipedema (Grade I = 25%; Grade II = 75%) were divided into three groups according to the compression tights prototype assigned: control (n = 9), Flat (n = 7) and circular (n = 8). The participants performed a gait test two times, separated by 15 days: before wearing the tights of the study and after the treatment (15 days employing compression tights). Skin temperature was measured using infrared thermography before and after the gait test on both days, and six regions of interest were determined in the anterior and posterior leg. The skin temperature decreased in the different regions of interest after exercise in all the groups (e.g., anterior thigh (IC95% (−1.1, −0.7 °C) p < 0.001), but no differences were observed in skin temperature between groups before and after walking (p > 0.05). The use of compressing tights for 15 days does not alter skin temperature in women with lipedema before and after walking. The absence of differences in skin temperature between tights in the different assessments allows for obtaining the benefits of wearing compression tights during exercise without negative thermal effects.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced pneumatic compression devices (APCDs) have been shown to be an effective intervention for lymphedema when used as part of a self-care maintenance treatment regimen. However, adherence to self-care is poor, and APCDs require patients to be immobile during treatment. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel non-pneumatic compression device (NPCD) for treating lymphedema versus an APCD. METHODS: A randomized, crossover head-to-head investigation at five US sites in 2021. Patients were randomized to either the NPCD or a commercially-available APCD. Subjects used the randomly assigned initial device for 28 days with a 4-week washout period prior to a comparable 28-day utilization of the second device. RESULTS: Data from 50 adult women with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) were analyzed. When compared with the APCD, the NPCD was associated with greater mean reduction in limb edema volume (64.6% vs. 27.7%, p<0.001), significantly greater mean improvements in quality of life scores, greater adherence (95.6% vs. 49.8%, p<0.001), and greater satisfaction with the device (90% vs. 14%, p<0.001). Patients indicated that the NPCD facilitated exercise and was convenient for travel. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The novel NPCD is an effective maintenance treatment for reducing limb volume in BCRL patients. The device was more effective than an APCD and resulted in higher adherence to self-care interventions and greater patient satisfaction.

Background: Lipedema is a distinct adipose disorder from obesity necessitating awareness as well as different management approaches to address pain and optimize quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this proof-of-principle study is to evaluate the therapeutic potential of physical therapy interventions in women with lipedema. Methods and Results: Participants with Stage 1-2 lipedema and early Stage 0-1 lymphedema (n = 5, age = 38.4 ± 13.4 years, body mass index = 27.2 ± 4.3 kg/m2) underwent nine visits of physical therapy in 6 weeks for management of symptoms impacting functional mobility and QoL. Pre- and post-therapy, participants were scanned with 3 Tesla sodium and water magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), underwent biophysical measurements, and completed questionnaires measuring function and QoL (patient-specific functional scale, PSFS, and RAND-36). Pain was measured at each visit using the 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS). Treatment effect was calculated for all study variables. The primary symptomatology measures of pain and function revealed clinically significant post-treatment improvements and large treatment effects (Cohen's d for pain VAS = -2.5 and PSFS = 4.4). The primary sodium MRI measures, leg skin sodium, and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) sodium, reduced following treatment and revealed large treatment effects (Cohen's d for skin sodium = -1.2 and SAT sodium = -0.9). Conclusions: This proof-of-principle study provides support that persons with lipedema can benefit from physical therapy to manage characteristic symptoms of leg pain and improve QoL. Objective MRI measurement of reduced tissue sodium in the skin and SAT regions indicates reduced inflammation in the treated limbs. Further research is warranted to optimize the conservative therapy approach in lipedema, a condition for which curative and disease-modifying treatments are unavailable.

(1) Background: Due to insufficient knowledge of lipoedema, the treatment of this disease is undoubtedly challenging. However, more and more researchers attempt to incorporate the most effective lipoedema treatment methods. When assessing a new therapeutic method, choosing correct, objective tools to measure the therapeutic outcome is very important. This article aims to present possible instruments that may be used in the evaluation of therapeutic effects in patients with lipoedema. (2) Methods: The data on therapeutic outcome measurements in lipoedema were selected in February 2022, using the Medical University of Gdansk Main Library multi-search engine. (3) Results: In total, 10 papers on this topic have been identified according to inclusion criteria. The tools evaluating the therapeutic outcomes used in the selected studies were: volume and circumference measurement, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, ultrasonography and various scales measuring the quality of life, the level of experiencing pain, the severity of symptoms, functional lower extremity scales, and a 6 min walk test. (4) Conclusion: The tools currently used in evaluating the effectiveness of conservative treatment in women with lipoedema are: volume and circumference measurement, waist-to-hip ratio, body fat percentage, ultrasonography, VAS scale, quality of life scales (SF-36, RAND-36), symptom severity questionnaire (QuASiL), Lower Extremity Functional Scale and 6 min walk. Choosing a proper tool to measure the treatment outcome is essential to objectively rate the effectiveness of therapeutic method.

Lipoedema has received increased attention in recent years. Overlaps with obesity sometimes make it difficult to differentiate. However, this is important for a differentiated targeted therapy. Definition and clinic Lipoedema is a painful, genetic, exces sive increase in adipose tissue on the extremities in women. This leads to a disproportion of the body. The first symptoms often manifest themselves in puberty, the course is usually progressive. Characteristic symptoms are pain at rest and pressure, tendency to hematoma, feelings of tension and swelling, rapid fatigue of the muscles and edema, which are inconsistent depending on the stage. 25–88 % of lipoedema patients suffer from obesity at the same time. Prevalence Depending on the study, 5–9.7 %, corresponding to 2–4 million women in Germany. Etiology Family disposition is obvious. Hormonal changes are trigger factors and suggest hormonal influences. In the tissue there is a slight chronic inflammation (silent inflammation), which explains the symptoms. Diagnosis The diagnosis is made clinically and must be distin guished from other fat distribution disorders. The BMI is not suitable. The waist circumference-size quotient (BCG = WHtR Waist to Height-Ratio) should be used. Therapy interdisciplinary therapeutic approach,which inaddi tion to conservative decongestion therapy, surgical therapy by liposuction also includes nutrition, exercise and psychotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Despite an increasing demand for surgical treatment of lipedema, the evidence for liposuction is still limited to five peer-reviewed publications. Little is known about the influence of disease stage, patient age, body mass index, or existing comorbidities on clinical outcomes. Considering the chronically progressive nature of lipedema, it was hypothesized that younger patients with lower body mass index and stage would report better results. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center, noncomparative study included lipedema patients who underwent liposuction between July of 2009 and July of 2019. After a minimum of 6 months since the last surgery, all patients completed a disease-related questionnaire. The primary endpoint was the need for complex decongestive therapy based on a composite score. Secondary endpoints were the severity of complaints (i.e., spontaneous pain, sensitivity to pressure, feeling of tension, bruising, impairment of body image) measured on a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: One hundred six patients underwent a total of 298 large-volume liposuctions (mean lipoaspirate, 6355 ± 2797 ml). After a median follow-up of 20 months (interquartile range, 10 to 42 months), a median complex decongestive therapy score reduction of 37.5 percent (interquartile range, 0 to 88.8 percent; p < 0.0001) was observed. An improvement in lipedema-associated symptoms was also observed (p < 0.0001). The percentage reduction in complex decongestive therapy scores was greater in patients with a body mass index less than or equal to 35 kg/m2; (compared to higher body mass index; p < 0.0001) and in stage I and II patients (compared to stage III patients; p = 0.0019). CONCLUSION: Liposuction reduces the severity of symptoms and the need for conservative treatment in lipedema patients, especially if it is performed in patients with a body mass index below 35 kg/m2; at an early stage of the disease. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Lymphatic drainage is the main form of therapy for lymphedema, as it affects the pathophysiology of this clinical condition. The two main objectives of lymphatic drainage are the formation and drainage of lymph. In recent years, Godoy &amp; Godoy developed a novel concept of mechanical lymphatic drainage involving a device denominated RAGodoy®, which performs passive exercises of the lower and upper limbs as a form of lymphatic drainage. The aim of the present study was to address the concept of this therapy as well as perform a literature review on its forms of use and the results obtained. All studies analyzed show that this technique used as monotherapy enables the treatment of lymphedema, but superior results are achieved when combined with compression mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema often remains undiagnosed in patients with obesity, leading to mismanagement of treatment. Because of this, despite remarkable weight loss after bariatric surgery and decreases in hip and abdomen circumference, some patients show only small decreases in circumference of the extremities and report persistent limb pain. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work is to raise awareness of lipedema coincident with obesity, mistakenly diagnosed as obesity alone, in order to ensure the correct diagnosis of the condition and to achieve better treatment outcomes for people with lipedema and coincident obesity. SETTING: CG Lympha Clinic, Cologne, and Ernst von Bergmann Clinic, Potsdam. METHODS: From clinical records, we identified 13 patients who were diagnosed with lipedema only after undergoing bariatric surgery. We describe the course of their pain before and after bariatric surgery, focusing on the long-term progression of symptoms accompanying the disease. RESULTS: Lipedema cannot be cured by bariatric surgery, and although the patients in this study lost an average of more than 50 kg of weight, they displayed no improvement in the pain symptoms typical of lipedema. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the different etiologies of lipedema and obesity, lipedema requires its own specific treatment. Patients suffering from obesity should always be assessed for pain and lipedema. If coincident lipedema is diagnosed, we suggest that bariatric surgery only be performed first if diet and exercise have failed, the patient's body mass index is >40 kg/m2, and the patient has been informed of the possible persistence of pain. Lipedema, like a coincident disease, must be additionally treated conservatively or preferably surgically. This optimized treatment may help to better manage patient expectations after weight loss.

Background: A detailed quantitative evaluation would be beneficial for management of patients with limb lymphedema. Methods and Results: In 47 patients with lower limb lymphedema at International Society of Lymphology clinical stage 2A (18 limbs), 2B (41 limbs), and 3 (13 limbs), we measured the limb circumference and thickness of epidermis, dermis, and subcutis layers with B-mode ultrasonography and subcutis elastic modulus with ultrafast shear wave velocity (ultrasound elastography) at 5 anatomical levels (M1 to M5) before and after a 3- to 5-day intensive decongestive therapy (IDT) session. Limb circumference and thickness of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis were greater in the 72 limbs with lymphedema than in the 22 unaffected limbs before and after IDT. The affected limb volume was 10,980 [8458-13,960] mL before and 9607 [7720-11,830] mL after IDT (p < 0.0001). The IDT-induced change in subcutis thickness was -9 [-25 to 13]% (NS), -11 [-26 to 3]% (p = 0.001), -18 [-40 to -1]% (p < 0.0001), -15 [-35 to 3]% (p = 0.0003), and -25 [-45 to -4]% (p < 0.0001) and significantly correlated with the change in elastic modulus, which was 13 [-21 to 90]% (p = 0.004), 33 [-27 to 115]% (p = 0.0002), 40[-13 to 169]% (p < 0.0001), 9 [-36 to 157]% (p = 0.024), and -13 [-40 to 97]% (NS), respectively, at the M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 levels. Intraobserver reproducibility was satisfactory for skin thickness and fairly good for elastography, but interobserver reproducibility was poor or unacceptable. Conclusions: IDT reduced the circumference and subcutis thickness of lower limbs with lymphedema and increased their elastic modulus, implying greater tissue stiffness probably due to fluid evacuation. Although subcutis thickness measurement proved to be reliable, technological and methodological improvements are required before ultrasonographic elastography can be used in clinical practice.