Full bibliography
Comparative Analysis of Liposuction and Conservative Treatment in Lipedema Patients: A Modified Body-Q Questionnaire Study
Resource type
Authors/contributors
- Aitzetmüller-Klietz, Marie-Luise (Author)
- Ozturk, Mahmut (Author)
- Seefeldt, Tobias (Author)
- Wiebringhaus, Philipp (Author)
- Wellenbrock, Sascha Veiz (Author)
- Tav, Baksan (Author)
- Hirsch, Tobias (Author)
- Harati, Kamran (Author)
- Aitzetmüller-Klietz, Matthias (Author)
Title
Comparative Analysis of Liposuction and Conservative Treatment in Lipedema Patients: A Modified Body-Q Questionnaire Study
Abstract
Background: Despite its estimated high prevalence among women and increasing awareness, lipedema remains under-investigated. Ignoring its debilitating nature, surgical treatment for this condition is frequently covered by health insurance only in advanced stages and after the exhaustion of conservative therapies. Methods: A total of 1015 patients with lipedema were recruited via social media platforms. Of these, 860 patients provided answers to at least one complete section of the modified Body-Q questionnaire (response rate 85%). The Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were utilized to assess the impact of the surgical treatment by means of patient-reported outcomes on the self-perception of various body areas. Results: The satisfaction scores among conservatively treated patients for abdominal appearance, arms, back, body, buttocks, and inner thighs showed a statistically significant decline with increasing stages of lipedema. The comparison of patient evaluation scores in the appearance domain demonstrated better patient self-perception scores in patients who received at least one session of the surgical treatment for the hips and thighs (p < 0.01), inner thighs (p < 0.01), and excess skin (0.01) scales. On the body scale, the patients who underwent liposuction again reported better satisfaction scores; however, this did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.081). In the health-related quality of life domain, the patients who received liposuction treatment reported a better outcome in the body image (p < 0.01), physical function (p = 0.05), physical symptoms (p = 0.04), and psychological function (p < 0.01) scales. Conclusions: The current study underscores the burden of lipedema of affected patients and its negative impact on self-perception. As the disease progresses, conservatively treated patients experience a decline in satisfaction with various aspects of their appearance. However, surgical interventions, particularly liposuction, does not address esthetic concerns but significantly improve health-related quality of life across multiple domains, emphasizing the comprehensive benefits of surgical intervention in the management of lipedema.
Publication
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
279
Date
01/06/2025
Language
en
ISSN
2077-0383
Short Title
Comparative Analysis of Liposuction and Conservative Treatment in Lipedema Patients
Accessed
1/8/25, 3:28 PM
Library Catalog
Extra
Number: 1
Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citation
Aitzetmüller-Klietz, M.-L., Ozturk, M., Seefeldt, T., Wiebringhaus, P., Wellenbrock, S. V., Tav, B., Hirsch, T., Harati, K., & Aitzetmüller-Klietz, M. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Liposuction and Conservative Treatment in Lipedema Patients: A Modified Body-Q Questionnaire Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(1), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010279
Publication
Link to this record